NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 51/20 DEY STREET 1075702, 80/4
Document / 17 pages

DEP menu form for 20 Dey Street, Dec 2006

Machine-extracted title · confidence 90%

Department of Environmental Protection internal menu form dated December 12, 2006, associated with the building at 20 Dey Street.

NYC-WTC_000126218–000126234

Folder label: “20 DEY STREET 1075702, 80/4

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000126225
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS QUESTIONS 1, APPLICANTS NAME 2. FIPS NUMBER 3. DATE City of New York, Department of Design and Construction (DDC) 061.51000.10 1/7102 4. PROJECT NAME 5. LOCATION World Trade Center (WTC) and Surrounding Facilities New York City. New York

h _ Fot m must be filled'out--for each project. 1. Does the damaged facility or Item of work have insurance and/or Is it an insurable nsk? (e.g.. bwidings, equipment vehicles, etc.) ® Yes 0 No 0 Unsure Comments Act structures witlun the WTC oomptex and surrounding Structures carry

owranw - NYC. ;s ~.t1n1/t tic J ~f- f~. — jv 7C rind uic, I 2. Is the damaged facility located within a Rood*m or coastal high hazard area, or does it have an wiped on a floodplain or wetland? 0 Yes 0 No O Unsure Comments Property Idea partially within 100-Year flood zone (Zone A5) as shown on

Flood insurance Rate Map No. 360107. Panel 00546, Effective Date November 10 1963.

3. Is the damaged racsty or Item of work located within or adjacent to a Coastal Barrier Resource System Unit or an Otherwise Protected Ana?

❑ Yes ®No ❑ Unsure Comnents ,.

4. WIN floe proposed facility repeirshedonstrudion change the pro-diessler condition? (e.g.. lcotpinr matenat location, 01pa04y, use or fundfon) ❑ Yes 0 No 0 Unsure Comments There Is no established plan as to post disaster.

5. Does the applicant have a hazard mitigation proposal or wand lie app5ca t Eke technical assistance for a hazard mitigation proposal? ❑ Yea ®No ❑ Unsure Comments

— E

6. Is the damaged facility on the National Register of Hatok Places or the state historic Eating? Is It older than 50 years? Are there more, stnlar bindings near the site? ❑ Yes 0 No 0 Unsure Comments

7. Are then any pristine or undisturbed arils on. or now. the project site? Are there large tracts of tonsland? (7 Yes ® No Q lawn Commend

8. Are there any hazardous materials at or a4acr d to the damaged faclUty endlor lam of wok? ® Vii ❑ No ❑unsure Commanp Asbesos. toxic gas (e.g. Freon), inorganic mercury and other heavy metals,

lead based pains, silicates. PCBs, and unexploded ordinaries,

9. Are there any other ernlronme:ntally or oonhovenial hugs associated with the damaged fad hty and or item of work? cc Yes O No 0 Unsure Corrvnenes Demolition of the structures has and oil mfflnue to generals loge

amounts of dust

CrwA corm we-i 20, NOV im

NYC-WTC 000126225

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000126225Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →