NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/DEP Box 46/19 RECTOR ST 1000794, 18/27
Document / 7 pages

DEP Letter regarding 88 Greenwich Street, Feb 2003

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

February 2003 letter from DEP confirming non-asbestos material and acceptable air levels at 88 Greenwich Street.

NYC-WTC_000117244–000117250

Folder label: “19 RECTOR ST 1000794, 18/27”

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000117250
OCR text

OCR status: ocr · source: ours

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document 02/21/2003 13:57 FAX Hie 21% FOND U1/50 '03 18:3 id1007/007 QE tye cma 196 648 35d EMCA :38 NO.797 07/07 avy. | = C) A c © Environmental Monitoring & Consulting Associates ‘FO. BOX B72 « SOMERVILLE, Nu C8876 - (7az) 249-8005 » FAX (742) 240-5886 TO: Mr. John O'Brian 88 Greenwich LLC BE Greenwich Street New York, New York 10006 RE; AIRBORNE ASBESTOS ANALYSIS/88 GREENWICH STREET/NEW YORK, NEW YORIY AREA ALR MONITORING CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Airborne Asbestos Analysis NIOSH Method No. 7400 - Phase Contrast Microscopy DATE MOLUME SAMPLE/LOCATION ETBERS/CG Ig/leA2 $504 3818001/Twenty-First Floor 0.00! Apattment# Pll Balcony/ East Side Of Building 12/18/02 950 L $81 8002/Twenty-Fourth Fleor/ <0,001 Skyline Terrave/South Side Of Building ~ NYC-WTC_000117250

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000117250Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →