NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 37/29 BROADWAY; Block: 20; Lot: 1; BIN: 1000802; 1-9 Trinity Place, 2-6 Morris Street
Document / 7 pages

Letter re: DEP program for 29 Broadway, May 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Attorneys for the owner of 29 Broadway respond to a DEP letter regarding the cleaning program.

NYC-WTC_000105487–000105493

Folder label: “29 BROADWAY; Block: 20; Lot: 1; BIN: 1000802; 1-9 Trinity Place, 2-6 Morris Street

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000105487
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

ANDERSON KILL & OLICK, P.C. (including the practice of DeForest & Duer) Attorneys and Counsellors at Law 1251 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS ■ NEW YORK, NY 10020 TELEPHONE: 212-278-1000 ■ FAX: 212-278-1733 www.andersonkill.com James P. Cullen, Esq. (212)278-1565 [email protected]

May 22, 2002

VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS

R. Radhakrishnan, P.E. Director, Asbestos Control Program New York City Department of Environmental Protection 59-17 Junction Boulevard Flushing, New York 11373

Re: 29 Broadway New York, New York

Dear Mr. Radhakrishnan:

We are counsel to Trinity Morris Corp., owner of 29 Broadway. Our client is in receipt of your letter dated May 3, 2002 and a proposed License Agreement, which relate to your department's cleaning program for certain buildings in downtown Manhattan.

Our client has already undertaken on its own initiative some cleanup work in the aftermath of the World Trade Center attacks. Our client submitted an insurance claim to its carrier based on these cleanup costs. The claim has not been settled. I was concerned after reading paragraph 4 of the License Agreement that the City was seeking assignment of insurance proceeds our client should receive from its carrier to reimburse our client for earlier cleanup costs.

Your deputy, Penny Theodorellys, was kind enough to respond to my phone call on May 22, 2002 and clarify that the City does not take the position that it will assert claims against insurance proceeds received for cleanup costs previously incurred by owners. She explained it is the City's intention, as clarified by an internal memo or letter from your Office of General Counsel, that the City would seek reimbursement from insurance proceeds only where no cleanup costs were incurred by the owner or to the extent the allocable proceeds were in excess of those costs.

Based on the foregoing clarification and understanding, we have advised our client that they may execute the License Agreement. If my understanding of Ms. Theodorellys' advice is not correct, kindly correct my understanding and consider our client's consent to the

NYDOCS1-632216.1

NEW YORK, NY ■ CHICAGO, IL ■ NEWARK, NJ ■ PHILADELPHIA, PA ■ WASHINGTON, DC ■ GREENWICH, CT

NYC-WTC 000105487

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000105487Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →