NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 34/101 MAIDEN LANE Block: 68 Lot: 10 BIN: 1001122 201-2030 Pearl Street
Document / 9 pages

DEP letter regarding dust survey, 101 Maiden Lane, April 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Letter from Colliers ABR confirming no further action required for dust accumulation on the roof and setbacks of 101 Maiden Lane.

NYC-WTC_000100052–000100060

Folder label: “101 MAIDEN LANE Block: 68 Lot: 10 BIN: 1001122 201-2030 Pearl Street

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000100053
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document 04/09/2002 15:08 FAX Q 003 Q 001 09/2002 0852 FAX 2129444819 AMBIENT GROUP

^ ~s

'°~ ambient group, inc. 55 West 39th Street New York, NY 10018

Facsimile Cover Sheet To: Colliers ABR Company: Carolyn Malloy Phone: (212) 318-9719 Fax; (212) 421-4191

FROM: Jack Springston, CIH, CSSP Company: Ambient Group, Inc. Phone: (212) 944-4615 Fax: (212) 944-4618

Date: 4/9/02 Pages including this 4 cover page: cc;

Comments: Attached please find a copy of the bulk sampling results from 101 Maiden Lane. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me,

NYC-WTC 000100053

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000100053Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →