NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/DEP Box 02/99 WALL STREET Block: 33 Lot: 22
Document / 1 page

Letter clearing 67 and 99 Wall Street for re-occupancy

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Correspondence enclosing inspection reports confirming that 67 and 99 Wall Street are clear for re-occupancy.

NYC-WTC_000094770

Folder label: “99 WALL STREET Block: 33 Lot: 22”

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000094770
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

•

£I&al m&?zefet 67 WALL STREET NEW YORK, N. Y. 10003 February 19, 2002 12121 269-3430

City of New York Department of Environmental Protection 59-17 Junction Blvd. Corona, NY 11368 Attn: R. Radhakrishnan, P.E.

Re: 67 & 99 Wall Street, New York

Dear Ms. Radhakrishnan

As requested by you on 2/14/02.

Enclosed, please find reports dated 10/18/01, from Central Environmental, Inc. for 99 Wall Street and dated 9/23/01 for 67 Wall Street.

Both reports clear the buildings for re-occupancy.

Very truly yours, Schlang Bros. & Co., Inc.- Agent

By David Schlang, President Ds/nv

C:\My Documents\City of New York Enviromental Prot.doc

NYC-WTC 000094770

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000094770Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

NYC-WTC_000140708 · Box DEP Box 05

Minutes from a March 20, 2002 meeting covering task force interactions and chemical risk characterization.

Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer

Compare copies and versions →