Copies and versions

Copies are not independent tests. A high similarity score can also match a reused form; it does not establish which copy came first or whether their findings agree.

• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29028, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035990

  · similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments for sample AD29022, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035820

  · similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments for sample AD29024, Dec 18 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035909

  · similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29138, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035967

  · similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019111

  · similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29140, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036029

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results sample AD29459, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036447

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results sample AD29457, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036425

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29029, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035944

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results sample AD29290, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036371

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results, sample AD30255, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019153

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results sample AD29289, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036360

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29287, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036126

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results sample AD29458, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036436

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results sample AD29461, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036469

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments for sample AD29190, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035843

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS re-analysis comments, sample AD29232, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036184

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results sample AD29462, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036480

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD28968, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000018026

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29189, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036103

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD28898, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035683

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD28897, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035727

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019090

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD28903, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035580

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019070

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD28861, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035745

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD28859, December 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035505

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD28899, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035717

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AD30108, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016835

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, Sample AD28141, December 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000033865

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS unknowns analysis results for sample AD28326, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000033945

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD28141, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000033856

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD28900, Dec 16 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035755

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AD30009, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016816

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD28163, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000033847

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results, sample AD28432, November 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000034289

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments for sample AD28147, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000033874

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS unknowns analysis results for sample AD28229, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000033954

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD28862, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035737

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results, sample AD28903, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035563

  · similarity 0.995 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS method 508 blank results, Dec 16 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035664

  · similarity 0.993 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS results for unknowns, sample AD26830, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000018913

  · similarity 0.992 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Selected filing

GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29089, December 2001

NYC-WTC_000036000

Analysis comments for sample AD29089 reporting no unusual compounds in GCMS scan but noting one compound recovery above acceptance range in LCS Standard.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 22

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.

Comparison filing

GCMS analysis comments, Sample AD28141, December 2001

NYC-WTC_000033865

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of sample AD28141 showing no unusual compounds detected; method acceptance ranges to be established and used.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 21

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.