Copies and versions
← Back to recordCopies are not independent tests. A high similarity score can also match a reused form; it does not establish which copy came first or whether their findings agree.
- GCMS analysis comments for sample AD29024, Dec 18 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000035909
· similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29089, December 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000036000
· similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29140, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000036029
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments for sample AD29190, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000035843
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29138, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000035967
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16
NYC-WTC_000019111
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis results sample AD29290, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000036371
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis results, sample AD30255, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16
NYC-WTC_000019153
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis results sample AD29457, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000036425
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments, sample AD28903, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000035580
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS comments for sample AD28897, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000035727
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments, sample AD28859, December 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000035505
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16
NYC-WTC_000019070
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29189, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000036103
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS comments for sample AD28861, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000035745
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments, sample AD28965, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000035589
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis results sample AD29459, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000036447
· similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS comments for sample AD28899, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000035717
· similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments, sample AD28967, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000035607
· similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis results for sample AD28267, Nov 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000034415
· similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments for sample AD29188, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000035798
· similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS comments for sample AD28141, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 21
NYC-WTC_000033856
· similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS comments for sample AD28900, Dec 16 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000035755
· similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments for sample AD28147, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 21
NYC-WTC_000033874
· similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS comments for sample AD28153, Nov 2001 · Box DEP Box 21
NYC-WTC_000033742
· similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS comments for sample AD28265, Nov 2001 · Box DEP Box 21
NYC-WTC_000033825
· similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments for sample AD28690, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000035044
· similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS comments for sample AD28151, Nov 2001 · Box DEP Box 21
NYC-WTC_000033789
· similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS unknowns analysis results for sample AD28229, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 21
NYC-WTC_000033954
· similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments for sample AD28651, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000034938
· similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis results, sample AD28903, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000035563
· similarity 0.995 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS blank analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16
NYC-WTC_000016681
· similarity 0.994 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS method 508 blank results, Dec 16 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000035664
· similarity 0.993 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
Selected filing
GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29028, Dec 2001NYC-WTC_000035990
Laboratory report noting detection of bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate in sample AD29028 analyzed on December 18, 2001.
Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 22
Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.

Comparison filing
GCMS comments for sample AD28153, Nov 2001NYC-WTC_000033742
Analytical commentary for sample AD28153 dated November 29, 2001, noting no unusual compounds but low recovery rates for LCS standards.
Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 21
Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.
