NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/DEP Box 21/GCMS X 11/2/01 A 12/1/01
Document / 16 pages

GCMS analysis results for sample AD26206, Dec 2001

Machine-extracted title · confidence 90%

Laboratory report documenting GCMS analysis of sample AD26206 with unidentified compounds detected.

NYC-WTC_000031171–000031186

Folder label: “GCMS X 11/2/01 A 12/1/01”

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000031171
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

, Comments for Sample AD26207 - Analysis $GCMS

Westchester Dept, of Labs & Research User Vinci, David L Date: 12-07-2001 Time: 19:20:57

A scan of the extract prepared for the 508 analysis, from 35 to 550 amu using a mass spectrometer, reveals the possible presence of 1,1'-oxybis(2-ethoxy-)ethane at an estimated level of 108 Uig/IL and with a fit of 39 out of 100, N,4-dimethyl-Benzenesulfonamide at an estimated level of 8.3 ug/L and with a fit of 91 out of 100, 3-methoxy-1 -Propanamine at’a aresiimated level of 19 ug/L and with a fit of 35 out of 100, and N-butyl-N,4-dimeethly-Benzenesulfonamide at an estimated level of 22 ug/L and with a fit of 50 oi> W100. The Field Blank for this sample will be analyzed.

NYC-WTC_000031171

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000031171Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

DEP GCMS data table, Jan-Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 12

NYC-WTC_000004149

Large multi-page laboratory data sheet containing sample analysis results and metadata for DEP GCMS records from January to February 2002.

1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.994

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →