NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 80 pages

NYC-WTC_000233682

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000233682–000233761
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000233757
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

response guidelines

• Identify sites and initiate site • Estimate affected area and isolate • Characterize affected area. characterization. if possible. • Revise public health protection 1 • Begin analysis of available • Implement appropriate public measures as necessary. water quality data. health protection measures. • Provide alternate water supply. s • Investigate unusual • Plan for alternate water supply. • Plan remediation activities. p consumer complaints. • Analyze samples. o • Consult external information • Perform site characterization at sources. additional investigation sites. s

Consumer Complaint

THREAT EVALUATION STAGE Possible ________ Credible_______ Confirmatory I • Compilation of consumer • Results of site characterization at • Results of sample analysis. n complaints, including selected investigation sites. • Contaminant information. geographic distribution. • Summary of historic consumer • Results of site characterization f • Recent water quality data complaints. at other investigation sites. Bl that may be associated with • Results of consumer interviews. • Input from primacy agency r complaints. • Contaminant information. and public health agency. o • Operational information coiTesponding to the time of Bl the unusual complaints. t i o ■ • Are the complaints unusual? • Do site characterization results • Were unusual contaminants reveal signs of contamination? detected during analysis? Do i • Could operational changes be the cause? • Are other consumers in the area they pose a risk to the public? • Could changes in source experiencing similar water • Do site characterization results water quality be the cause? quality? reveal signs of contamination? 1 • Are the complaints clustered • Are the unusual complaints • Is contamination indicated by a in a specific area? significantly different from “preponderance of evidence?” • Are complaints from typical complaints? habitual complainers? • Are the complaints indicative of a specific contaminant? i • Is there anything unusual about the water quality in the area? IB

75 Interim Final - August 2004

CITY_21MC100_004992414

NYC-WTC_000233757

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000233757Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

No available related records indexed in this group.

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

NYC-WTC_000165900 · Box 7DDC

Document page containing contact details for Con Edison and JWC Environmental Health & Safety personnel.

Similar indexed content

NYC-WTC_000149798 · Box DEP Box 10

Generic form or header page from the Department of Environmental Protection regarding general World Trade Center notices and requests.

Similar indexed content

Compare copies and versions →