NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 1 page

NYC-WTC_000229356

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000229356
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000229356
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

TEM Asbestos fair) Count Sheet Client Name: NYCBGE Volume (liters): 1920 Lab Group #; 8229 Filter Type / Filter Area: MCE 385 Lab Sample #: 2 Grid Opening Size: 0.01124

Client Sample #; 02 Area Examined: 0.04496 mnY GRID BOX: Magnification: 20,000 GRID ID: Accelerating Voltage: 100 KeV # Grid Openings: 4 Analysis Date: 6/23/02

Analysis Performed By: ROMAN PEYSAKHOV

GO. Structure StRJCture Type Length lOdShucture N or EDS No Nocast) AmbgjND {Nonadb F B C M >=05 jj ~ >=5m Ctir^ AmpMbote <5m Elements)

t

Struct = > 0.5u > 5:1 Aspect Ratio Grid acceptance: - 4= Positive diffraction pattern properties confonrtng to Totals latxnatny identtfication criteria observed <10% psfocuidtS'Covdrsoo coverage aie least 20 unfolded of overlapped grid squares <5% F B C M >5p EDS spectrum conforming to tat)oratory holes or opaque'areas identification criteria observed Chrysotile ' AMPHIBOLES i Amphibole F - Single Fiber Amosite- - ■ B = Bundle (<3 fibers <1 fiber diameter apart Crocidolite Ambiguous C = Cluster t>3 Intersections) Anthophyllits Non-Asbestos Tremolite M - Matrix Actinolite Non-Identified NSD = No Structures Detected

CITY_2lMC100_000492036 NYC-WTC_000229356

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000229356Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

No available related records indexed in this group.

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →