NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 2 pages

NYC-WTC_000205691

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000205691–000205692
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000205692
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. "SERVING INDUSTRY WOFVDWfDE SINCE 1376* 129.. 11 IHfk .Avenue - College Po.ini, 11356 (718)961-8530 Ifax (718) 762^133'^

Page 2 of 2 Marchis, 2003 CLIENT: I-MesaB.C.L

PLM POINT COUNT ANALYSIS REPORT PERFORMED >Y EPA 600/R-93 /116 METHOD, *

Sample {Sample Appearance Asbestos Non^Asbeatos W Description % Type % Fibrous : % Non«ribroaa A2546 (1) DUst Sample : Various 4% Chiysotil^ 10% CcUuloSc : 46% Other ion Roof ; Fibrous 20% Fiber Glass { Heterogeneous 20% Min. Wool A2546 (2) Dust Sample i Various 3% Chrysotile 10% Cellulose 67%Oth8r ion Roof Fibrous 10% Fiber Glass Heterogeneous 10% Min. Wool .A2546 (3) Dust Sample Various 4% Chrysotile 10% Cellulose 67% Other ion Roof Fibrous Trace Amosite 10% Fiber Glass Heterogeneous 10% Miu. Wool PLM Z NOB

Comments; Fpr all obviously heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered san^ples, each component is analyzed separately. Also of Layers” refers to number of separable subsamples. • NY samples Analyzed by ELAP 198.1 method

* Disclaimer: {Polarized Light Microscopy is not reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials (NOBs). Results <1% are inconclusive arid quantitative TEM is currently the only method which can be used to determine if this material Can be considered or treated as con-asbestos containing. CITY_21MC1OO_OO3OO8816

NYC-WTC_000205692

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000205692Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →