NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 29 pages

NYC-WTC_000199582

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000199582–000199610
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000199602
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

• 'a

Toxicity criteria for asbestos:

Inhalation Unit Risk = 2.3 E-01 (fZcc)'' [IRIS, 2002]

Risk-based criteria were used to develop the Tiered benchmark levels for asbestos in air. Conservative assumptions of continuous exposure to a constant level of airborne fibers for either 1 year (Tier I) or 30 years (Tier III) were combined with the IRIS Slope Factor to establish benchmarks representative of a lx 10-4 estimate of excess lifetime cancer risk for each scenario. This approach makes several assumptions, chief among those is the quantification of asbestos fibers in air based on the PCM definition of a fiber (greater than 5um in length with an aspect ratio of 3:1 or greater) and the use of the IRIS Slope Factor which was designed to apply to fibers so defined. Although there is some concern regarding shorter fibers, the approach used here represents the current consensus by the US EPA for quantifying risk o:!" airborne asbestos fibers. It should be noted there is ongoing debate regarding the nature of health effects which may be attributed to shorter asbestos fibers. Both EPA and ATSDR are currently pursuing meetings to discuss and further refine these issues. However for the purposes of this response, addressing PCM equivalent fibers is considered protective.

The Tier I level for asbestos in settled dust was based on K factors [Millette and Hays, 1994], which are empirical relationships between concentrations of asbestos fibers in settled dust and indoor air. Millette developed the K factors by studying matched air and settled dust samples taken from various homes, at varying levels of activity in the home. The Tier I level was based on the K factor for a worst case scenario of a high level of activity. Although K factors are not rigorous enough to rely upon for a firm health decision, they are used here only to define what might constitute elevated fiber counts, that would need to be addressed as a near-term concern. This approach may overestimate potential exposures, but as such, is protective.

It should be noted that the airborne Tier I level of 0.028 fZcc PCM equivalents roughly equates to the AHERA TEM standard of 70 (0.022 fee) in total fiber counts. Based on empirical information from the WTC ambient air monitoring program [EPA, 2002c] that recorded less than 20% of total AHERA TEM fiber counts to be >5 um in length, the AHERA TEM standard of 70 f/mm^ (0.022 i'/cc) and the alternate AHERA PCM standard of 0.01 f/cc both meet the risk­ based criteria established for the Tier I screening level.

22

CITY_21MC100_002452173

NYC-WTC_000199602

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000199602Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

WTC health criteria appendix, Dec 2001

NYC-WTC_000176140

Appendix document outlining health protective screening values and contaminants of concern for WTC site workers and Lower Manhattan residents.

Similar indexed content

Compare copies and versions →