NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
If you were affected by the World Trade Center attack and receive rental
assistance from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA),
you may use the funds to clean your residence. ‘We’re giving people the
option to decide what makes most sense for them - either cleaning their
dwellings or finding someplace else to live,’ said Michael Cosbar, FEMA
housing officer. Instead of using the check to rent another place, renters
can use the funds to clean their residences. However, if vou use the funds
for cleaning, you will be ineligible for more FEMA rental assistance
lycflnSsfi ynu will Hp. aHlf* tn Tnnvft hade intn ymir
Unfortunately, for those lower income individuals whose apartments are highly
contaminated (and therefore are neither habitable nor able to be remediated with the
meager funds provided), this situation presents an untenable dilemma. FEMA rental
assistance is quickly ruiuiing out for these individuals and therefore, their temporary
residences are no longer going to be available to them. The worst case result: either
homelessness or forced habitation of residences known to be a direct health.
Commercial tenants, particularly smaller businesses, have had similar problems to
those of the residential tenants (large financial services firms were necessarily in better
shape “ they had the means to clean their own spaces and the leverage to get building
owners to clean the common areas). Small conunercial tenants were given the same,
inadequate cleaning protocols, have lacked sufficient funds (most have received only
loans, not direct grant assistance), and have had insurance claims denied due to Ms.
Whitman's safety assurances. They also had the same trouble getting their building
owners and managers to clean common spaces. But moreover, inaction on the part of
less scrupulous employers or business owners have left individual employees at these
firms with nowhere to turn if their employer chose not to test and remediate properly or at
all. Congressman Nadler's office has received numerous calls from employees of both
private and public entities who are concerned about the indoor air in their workplace, but
fear job loss if they "make too many waves."’’
Each of the problems noted above (and there are undoubtedly plenty of others)
has contributed to the fact that there has been utterly uneven, if not totally inadequate,
testing and remediation of hazardous materials in buildings in Lower Manhattan. This
fact, in and of itself, presents the most troubling issue: even when public spaces or single
apartments or offices are remediated appropriately, ventilation systems can move
hazardous materials fi-om unremediated spaces to those already remediated.’'* As one
downtown resident put it, “Indoor air quality is a touchy issue in our building. Converted
in the late 197O’s, we have a primitive central air system that circulates air fi-om
apartment to apartment. Some people in our building hired professional cleaners. Others
FEMA, “Disaster Assistance Guide: United We Stand,” New York, November 2,2001, FEMA Issue 2.
Statement taken from Constituent Services Staff Members, Office of Congressman Jerrold Nadler (NY-
08).
Letter from R. Radhakrishman (P.E., Director of NYC DEP’s Asbestos Control Program) to Building
Owners, February 12, 2002.
16
CITY_21MC100_003076434
NYC-WTC_000195756
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.