NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 2 pages

Asbestos sampling summary, 161 East Street, December 2001

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Summary report of asbestos air and dust sampling results from three locations at 161 East Street on December 8, 2001.

NYC-WTC_000186129–000186130
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000186130
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Summary ofAsbestos Sampling Results Page 2 of 3 Address: 161 East 88"' Street Date sampled: December 8, 2001

Results of Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) testing of air at 161 East 88^ Street, Dec. 8, 2001 Area Sampled Outside Common Residence 1

Sample Numbers A-0-32 A-C-32 A-Rl-32 A-Rl-X-32 * Concentration of Fibers at 161 East <0.001 0.002 <0.001 88'*’ Street (^cc)** 0.001* Concentration of Fibers in air at all <0.001 to 0.001 <0.001 to 0.002 <0.001 to 0.003 background locations (f/cc)

NYC Re-occupancy Standard 0.01 0.01 0.01 (f/cc)*** * Denotes a second air sample taken in the same location. ** f/cc is fibers in each cubic centimeter (cc) of air. This is calculated from the number of fibers seen on the air filter and the volume of air pulled through the filter measured in cubic centimeters. *** New York City Department of Environmental Protection asbestos clearance criteria for post-abatement work (Rules of the City of New York, Title 15, Chapter 1)

ASBESTOS DUST TEST RESULTS

In general, the dust and debris samples were examined by two different laboratory methods for asbestos fibers, Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). PLM is used to define asbestos containing material in dust and debris. A material is considered to be asbestos containing material if it contains more than 1% asbestos using the PLM method. The PLM method only counts the larger asbestos fibers. Therefore, if results by PLM were not greater than 1% asbestos, the sample was then analyzed by the TEM method that does count the smaller fibers. However, TEM analysis is not used for regulatory purposes for dust samples.

No asbestos fibers were found in the dust samples from the common area or in the residence by the PLM laboratory method. TEM analysis also did not detect any asbestos in the indoor dust. Not enough visible dust and debris was available for collection in the outdoor area.

Fibrous materials in dust found by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) Analysis: PLM identifies asbestos fibers by shape and optical characteristics. Other fibers such as fabric (synthetics), paper (cellulose) and fiberglass may be identified in the analysis. The laboratory analyst will count the fibers present to give an estimate of fiber content.

CITY_21MC100_0 04204853

NYC-WTC_000186130

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000186130Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →