NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 1 page

Analyst affidavit for DEP asbestos samples, July 2000

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Legal certification by a DEP analyst confirming the microscopic analysis of specific bulk sample numbers on July 10, 2000.

NYC-WTC_000182048
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000182048
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

ANALYST AFFIDAVIT

STATE OP NEW YORK COUNTY OP NEW YORK

I, G. Fruchtman, certify the following:

1. I am employed by New York City Department of Environmental

Protection in the capacity of analyst and analyzed the

following sample(s) on 07/10/00.

□EP Sample Identification #:

0071O/A078O03

00710/A078004

0O710/AO78O05

00710/A078006

2. These samples were analyzed microscopically in accordance with the analytical methods as specified by the New York State Department of Health, Environmental Laboratory Approval Progam (ELAP) and the National institute of Standards and Technology, National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Progam (NVLAP).

3. The results of this analysis are reflected in the attached Bulk Sample Analysis Report. This document is divided into columns labelled under "DEP Sample No." with the bulk sample number provided for that sample by the Departmmt of Environmental Protection (DEP) . -- A //

Sworn to before me this

day of 'Job ^7 ry Public _ or Commissioner of Deeds MWirua, Commlsstoner of DeMl> Qtty of NW york -No.*4115

CITY_DEP_WORBY_CANNATA_SUBP_000131463

NYC-WTC_000182048

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000182048Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →