31 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.994
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗WTC environmental investigation report, Sep 2002
Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%Comprehensive report on airborne and dust exposures in Lower Manhattan following the September 11 attacks, published by the Department of Health.
NYC-WTC_000178388–000178443
OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Final Technical Report of the Public Health Investigation Page 27 of 56 were alkaline (pH of 8.6 and 9.8). On the pH scale of 0 (acidic) to 14 (alkaline or basic), these values are slightly alkaline. Mineral analysis of these two settled surface dust samples estimate levels of calcite (15%J, 19%J) and portlandite (6%J, 3%J) were present, respectively. These crystalline minerals along with other components of concrete would have contributed to the measured alkalinity.
C. Air
The settled surface dust results discussed previously indicate the materials present in each area sampled. Fibers and small particles within the dust may become airborne during daily activity or during periods of high activity such as cleaning. Therefore, the settled surface dust sample results are an indicator for areas with a potential for airborne contaminants. Air sampling was conducted to determine the actual levels of fibers, dust, and crystalline minerals in the air at the time of settled surface dust sampling. Where feasible, these results are correlated to the settled surface dust results.
1. Fibers in Air
Samples for airborne fibers were first analyzed by phase contrast microscopy (PCM) to count all fibers present according to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Method 7400 counting rules. Phase contrast microscopy identifies fibers based on size and shape, but not the specific type of fiber. Therefore, the fibers seen by PCM include asbestos fibers as well as other fibers, such as textiles, fiberglass, and cellulose that might be present. Any sample with airborne fibers above the highest PCM levels found in the comparison locations was re analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The TEM methodology can distinguish what types of fibers are in a sample, particularly asbestos fibers. The SEM method identifies SVF. Some fibers present in the settled dust of the area may become suspended in the air and be present in the air sample.
a. Indoor Air
Fiber levels in air are expressed as the number of fibers in each cubic centimeter (cc) of air or fibers per cc (f/cc). Low levels of fibers were found in the comparison areas above 59th Street homes, where fiber levels ranged from less than 0.001 f/cc (<0.001 f/cc) to 0.003 f/cc. Because no asbestos was detected in the settled surface dust of the comparison areas above 59th Street, these fibers are not likely to have been asbestos. SEM analysis showed they were not SVF. Figure 7 shows all airborne fiber levels determined by PCM in the lower Manhattan area with respect to the fiber levels found in the comparison areas above 59th Street. These data represent all fibers found according to the analytical method used (NIOSH 7400) and are not specific to asbestos or SVF.
The majority of the lower Manhattan air samples from indoor areas without asbestos in the dust were within the range of fibers found in the comparison areas above 59th Street (<0.001 to
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gOv/asbestos/lowermanhattan/ResSamp_Sep2002_Text.html 07/18/2003 NYC-WTC_000178414
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Related records
Browse subjects →Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
Same-box records
No available related records indexed in this group.
Filed elsewhere
12 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗12 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗12 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗43 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.970
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.962
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000178054
Preliminary health evaluation report regarding the World Trade Center site submitted in October 2001.
8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.961
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗14 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.959
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000176156
Report enclosure detailing air and settled dust sampling results for Building 26, including PM size fraction analysis.
7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.958
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗20 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.956
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗9 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.956
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000145869
Interim final report from EPA Region 2 detailing a background study of environmental conditions at the World Trade Center site.
22 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.955
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗More like this page
Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
NYC-WTC_000146129
Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
Similarity score 0.999 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000146129
Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
Similarity score 0.978 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.976 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.974 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.974 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.974 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Others also read
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content