NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 1 page

TEM Asbestos air sample results, NYC BOE, Jan 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Laboratory analysis report for TEM asbestos air sampling at NYC Board of Education location dated January 23, 2002.

NYC-WTC_000174776
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000174776
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

TEM Asbestos (air) Count Sheet Client Name: NYC BOE Volume (liters): 1992 Lab Group #: 6409 Filter Type / Filter Area: MCE 385 mm^ Lab Sample #: 6 Grid Opening Size: 0.01124

Client Sample #: 06 Area Examined: 0.04496 mm^

GRID BOX: Magnification: 20,000 GRIP ID: Accelerating Voltage: 100 KeV # Grid Openings: 4 Analysis Date: 1/23/02

Analysis Performed By: MARKPEYSAKHOV

GO. Structure Structure Type Length ID of Structure N or y EDS (Nonadb ■ No F B C M >=05 p >=51J Chrys Amphibole Nonasb Ambig/ND No: Coord Elements)

; I

StTuct = > 0.5(1 .> 5:1 Aspect Ratio 3rid acceptance;

Positive diffraction pattern properties conforming to <50%' undissolved filter, overlapped or folded Totals laboratory identification criteria observed <10%: particulate coverage >50% coverage ate least 20 unfolded or overlapped grid squares <5% F .B C M >5p •/= EDS spectrurTi conforminc to laboratory holes or opaque areas identification criteria observed Chrysotile AMPHIBOLES Amphibole F = Singfo Fiber I Amosite B = Bundle (<3-fibers <1 fiber diameter apart I Crocidolite Ambiguous C = Cluster (>3 Intersections) Anthophyllite Non-Asbestos i Tremolite M = Matrix Actinolite Non-Identified NSD = No Structures Detected

CONFIDENTIAL, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER NO. 2, SEPT. 2008 CITY_21 MC100_014660209

NYC-WTC_000174776

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000174776Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →