NYC-WTC_000093788
Fax transmittal from the Mayor's Office regarding a March 2002 meeting with the building group.
52 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.994
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Forwarded programmatic agreement documentation addressing post-disaster building cleaning procedures and eligible building list for recovery efforts.
NYC-WTC_000164903–000164928
OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
wash in order to remove all of the remaining alkaline substance from the substrate in order to avoid burning or staining the historic fabric. The utilization of strong alkalis, with a pH 13- 14, including sodium hydroxide-based paint removers, should be avoided as their application can result in efflorescence or staining of the surface of masonry if not fully neutralized after application and removal. Hydroxide paint removers, including potassium, can adversely react with ferrous elements found in certain stones (e.g. Indiana limestone) and cause subsequent staining. Masonry surfaces should be tested with non-staining ph strips after removals are completed in order to ensure that the substrate has been adequately neutralized.
Removal utilizing Bleaches- Certain alkali-based bleaches, calcium hypochlorite for example, are sometimes used in poultices. When stains are not easily removable, bleaching may reduce the appearance of a stain.
Organic Solvents and Paint Removers- Chemical cleaning may be utilized alone or in conjunction with a poultice. Organic solvents are sometimes used in the form of a paste or a gel that will hold the solvent in place. The use of acidic or alkaline chemicals for cleaning can cause damage to building materials as well as pose health, safety, and environmental risks. Any cleaning application should be applied by a qualified professional and tested in an inconspicuous area or on mock-ups prior to widespread application. “Off the shelf’ graffiti removers should be avoided as their application in conjunction with scrubbing often results in the running or redistributing of a paint or stain on the surface of the historic fabric. Masonry surfaces should be tested with non-staining ph strips after removals are completed in order to ensure that the substrate has been adequately neutralized. Areas that are not being treated for the removal of applied paint (signage) should be appropriately masked and protected.
Abrasive Removal- Abrasive cleaning involves mechanically abrading a surface to remove staining. Traditional abrasive cleaning techniques, such as “sand-blasting” and high pressure water applications, are not suitable for cleaning historic buildings as older building materials can easily be damaged. Low or medium water pressure washing (100-400 psi) can damage historic masonry. An acceptable form of micro-abrasion (involving fine abrasive materials applied at pressures of 35-40 psi) used to mechanically remove markings from historic masonry should be carefully considered and implemented only by skilled workers under the direction of a building conservator or preservation professional. Abrasive cleaning should not be used on brick or glazed or polished surfaces.
Other Removal Methods- Removal methods such as laser cleaning have been recently developed. Experienced building conservators and/or preservation professionals should implement a removal program including a method such as laser cleaning.
Cleaning Considerations: Buildings are frequently composed of several different masonry materials. Each material must be determined, evaluated, and tested by an experienced conservation or preservation specialist prior to implementing a cleaning system.
22
NYC-WTC_000164925
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
No available related records indexed in this group.
NYC-WTC_000093788
Fax transmittal from the Mayor's Office regarding a March 2002 meeting with the building group.
52 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.994
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000150931
Cover fax from the Mayor's Office forwarding DEP documents regarding exterior clean-up to be reviewed before a meeting with building owners.
48 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.990
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000093746
Letter from FEMA providing a list of historic buildings and recommended cleaning treatments for post-disaster recovery.
46 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.964
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000094043
Letter from FEMA providing a list of historic buildings and recommended cleaning treatments for post-disaster recovery.
47 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.962
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000125098
Protocol document outlining air sampling and monitoring procedures for 130 Cedar Street.
7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.952
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000141674
Draft Programmatic Environmental Assessment for World Trade Center recovery activities dated January 24, 2002.
4 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.949
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000115479
Application for a license agreement between the City of New York and a landowner to clean exterior areas at 23 Park Row.
5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.948
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.948
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.948
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000115561
Attorney letter regarding legal proceedings between environmental protection authorities and property owners at 29 Park Row.
5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.948
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000099382
DEP license agreement for debris removal at 87 Nassau Street dated 2002.
4 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.947
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000115195
License agreement dated July 2002 between the City of New York and Atlanta 3 LLC authorizing debris removal at 215 Pearl Street.
5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.947
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
NYC-WTC_000093788
Fax transmittal from the Mayor's Office regarding a March 2002 meeting with the building group.
Similar indexed content
NYC-WTC_000150931
Cover fax from the Mayor's Office forwarding DEP documents regarding exterior clean-up to be reviewed before a meeting with building owners.
Similar indexed content
NYC-WTC_000093746
Letter from FEMA providing a list of historic buildings and recommended cleaning treatments for post-disaster recovery.
Similar indexed content
NYC-WTC_000094043
Letter from FEMA providing a list of historic buildings and recommended cleaning treatments for post-disaster recovery.
Similar indexed content
NYC-WTC_000125098
Protocol document outlining air sampling and monitoring procedures for 130 Cedar Street.
Similar indexed content