NYC-WTC_000093788
Fax transmittal from the Mayor's Office regarding a March 2002 meeting with the building group.
63 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.997
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Cover fax from the Mayor's Office forwarding DEP documents regarding exterior clean-up to be reviewed before a meeting with building owners.
NYC-WTC_000150931–000150959Folder label: “DEP EXTERIOR CLEAN UP - Also See Building Lists #2”

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document ' f.',—
Friday 15 of Mar 2002, Mayor Office ->718 595 4544 Page 24 of 29
wash in order to remove all of the remaining alkaline substance from the substrate in order to at'oid burning or staining the historic falAic, The utifizatiOiY^f strong alkalis, with a |)H 13- 14. including sodium hydro.xide-based paint removers, should be avoided as their application can result in efflorescence or staining of the surface of masonry if not fiilly neutralized after application and removal. Hydroxide paint removers, including potassium, can ad\ersel\' react with fetrous elements found in certain stones (e.g. Indiana limestone) and cause subsequent staining. .Masonry surfaces should be tested with non-staining ph strip.s after remo\ als are completed in order to ensure that the substrate has been adequately neutralized.
Removal utilizing Bleaches- Certain alkali-based bleaches, calcium hypochlorite for example, are sometimes used in poultices. When stains are not easily removable, bleaching may reduce the appearance of a stain.
Organic Solvents and Paint Removers- Chemical cleaning may be utilized alone or in conjunction with a poultice. Organic solvents are sometimes used in the fonn of a paste or a gel that '.'.ill hold the solvent in place. The use of acidic or alkaline chemicals for cleaning can cause damage to building materials as well as pose health, safety, and environmental risks. .-Vny cleaning application should be applied by a qualified professional and tested in an inconspicuous area or on mock-ups prior to widespread application. ’'Off the shelf graffiti remo\ers should be a\oided as their application in conjunction with scrubbing often results in the running or redistributing of a paint or stain on the surface of the historic fabric. .Masonry surfaces should be tested with non-staining ph strips after removals are completed in order to ensure that the substrate has been adequately neutralized. .Ai’ea.s that are not being treated for the removal of applied paint (signage) should be appropriately masked and protected.
Abrasive Removal- .Abrasive cleaning inA olves mechanically abrading a surface to remove staining. Traditional abrasive cleaning techniques, such a.s ■•sand-blasting" and high pressure water applications, are not suitable for cleaning historic buildings as older building materials can easily be damaged. Low or medium water pressure washing (100-400 psi) can damage historic masottry. .-Vn acceptable form of micro-abrasion (inx ohcing fine abrasive materials applied at pressures of 35-40 psi) used to mechanically remove markings from historic masonry should be careftilly considered and implemented only by skilled workers under the direction of a building conservator or preservation professional. Abrasive cleaning should not be used on brick or glazed or polished surfaces.
Other Removal Methods- Removal method.'; such as laser cleaning have been recently developed. Experienced building conserxators and'or preservation professionals should implement a removal program including a method such as laser cleaning.
Cleaning Considerations: Buildings are frequently composed of several different masonry materials. Each material must be determined, evaluated, and tested by an experienced conservation or preservation specialist prior to implementing a cleaning system.
NYC-WTC_000150954
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
No available related records indexed in this group.
NYC-WTC_000093788
Fax transmittal from the Mayor's Office regarding a March 2002 meeting with the building group.
63 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.997
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164903
Forwarded programmatic agreement documentation addressing post-disaster building cleaning procedures and eligible building list for recovery efforts.
48 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.990
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000094043
Letter from FEMA providing a list of historic buildings and recommended cleaning treatments for post-disaster recovery.
56 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.971
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000093746
Letter from FEMA providing a list of historic buildings and recommended cleaning treatments for post-disaster recovery.
56 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.970
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000115599
Confidential fax cover sheet from Ross & Harries to the Department of Environmental Protection regarding a specific matter.
5 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.955
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗5 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.955
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗5 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.955
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000115195
License agreement dated July 2002 between the City of New York and Atlanta 3 LLC authorizing debris removal at 215 Pearl Street.
5 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.955
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000123068
Letter from DEP notifying the owner of 189 Broadway that exterior surveys identified visible World Trade Center debris on the property.
5 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.954
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000134478
A letter of transmittal from PMS Construction Management Corp to the DEP regarding a job at 141 Greenwich Street dated November 13, 2002.
5 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.954
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000126787
Letter dated October 4, 2002 from Management Corp enclosing executed asbestos permit applications for 100 Church Street.
5 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.954
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗5 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.954
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
NYC-WTC_000150781
Notice instructing staff to preserve original World Trade Center documents for legal evidence.
Filed in the same folder
NYC-WTC_000150782
List of Manhattan buildings with completed exterior cleaning by the New York City DEP.
Filed in the same folder
NYC-WTC_000150796
Survey data listing building addresses and owners in the World Trade Center vicinity.
Filed in the same folder
NYC-WTC_000150821
Survey data listing building addresses and owners in the World Trade Center vicinity.
Filed in the same folder
NYC-WTC_000150823
Financial summary of exterior cleaning contracts for multiple buildings including budget allocations and balances.
Filed in the same folder