NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
. I
- :f-
'Avaltroni7Robert
From: Gilsenan, Michael
21
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Radhakrishnan, Krish; Theodorellys, Penny
Cc: Avaltroni, Robert; Chapin, Diana 001; Subasic, Rosemarie 1
Subject: FW: Strawman benchmarks for a couple of probable indoor COCs /
-----Original Message-----
'RodenGieclCSv^
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 12:54 PM
To: ‘[email protected]'; [email protected] ;
[email protected]; Rodenbeck, Sven; [email protected];
[email protected]; DeVoney, Danielle;
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Strawman benchmarks for a couple of probable indoor COCs
Hello Everyone!!
Attached below is the Asbestos Action Levels developed by the DHHS, EPA, OSHA
Environmental Assessment Working Group. This Action Levels were approved by all agencies
that participate on the Working Group. Therefore, I would propose that we use them for asbestos
in air.
Sven
—Original Message—
F rorn: ~'[email protected]^T^v
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 11:29 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected];
svrl @cdc.gov; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Strawman benchmarks for a couple of probable indoor COCs
I was hoping to have a more formalized package to distribute this morning, but this somewhat
crude approach will have to suffice. Listed below is the paradigm and I’ve taken a shot a filling in
asbestos and lead for both settled dust and indoor air. Enjoy.
I
Tier | Screening Value Action I
I I > E-04 (1 yr) or HQ = 10 | aggressive cleaning I
(professional?) - if
readings persist take
additional action to reduce |
exposure I
NYC-WTC_000164835
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.