NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 43/E-mails M. Gilsenan 2002
Document / 7 pages

Revised FEMA matrix with cost analysis questions, July 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 88%

EPA forwards revised FEMA matrix for WTC sampling and analysis work to DEP, requesting clarification on missing cost estimates for common space sampling.

NYC-WTC_000163886–000163892

Folder label: “E-mails M. Gilsenan 2002

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000163886
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Gilsenan, Michael

From: [email protected] Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 5:50 PM To: Gilsenan, Michael Cc: [email protected] Subject: revised matrix

WTCFEMAMATX.WP d In accordance with my previous message to Paul Barry attached is a revised matrix for your resubmission to FEMA. Please let us know if you have any questions. As I was studying these numbers again today I noticed on your cost sheet there is not a sampling estimate for the 3000 common spaces, I only could find an estimate for the 500 common spaces requiring scope B, I don't know where the estimate is for the other 2500 common spaces. Please let us know where that value is. Thanks

(See attached file: WTCFEMAMATX.wpd)

Dore LaPosta 212 637-3145 phone 212 637-3115 fax laposta.doreSepa.gov

1

NYC-WTC_000163886

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000163886Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →