Discussion on the implications of a bulk test result exceeding one percent asbestos in an unoccupied apartment.
NYC-WTC_000163696–000163698Folder label: “E-mails 2002 M. Gilsenan”
OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Gifsenan, Michael From: Jessica Leighton [email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 9:03 AM To: Jim Miller: Nancy Jeffery; Vincent Coluccio Cc: [email protected]: Greg Butler Subject: Re: Fwd: Residential Asbestos Sampling Results; 04/03/02 DRAFT: Notfor Public Release
ok with me.
»> Vincent Coluccio 04/10/02 08:03AM »> DEP made several good faith attempts to access the apartment and were rebuffed. This is not a situation with post abatement clearance requirements and DEP doesn’t have a mandate to inspect. Since they may never get access I suggest we modify the note on the chart (change in bold):
Building 11 Notes: Residence 2 was unoccupied when tested and was referred to DEP for reinspection. DEP was denied access to reinspect and will further attempt to reinspect this apartment. According to the landlord the apartment was cleaned prior to reoccupancy.
Vin
»> Jim Miller 04/09/02 08:08PM »> At a minimum, won't we want to wait until DEP re-attempts to visit the building to which access has been denied?
>>> Nancy Jeffery 04/09/02 05:07PM >» Hi Mary,
I wanted to let you know that the sampling plan is already a public document and is available on the NYC DOH website.
With regards to the Asbetos Sximmary Table, the results actually reflect low levels of asbetsos when detected, and the follow-up actions taken are reflected in the notes for specific buidlings.
Also, I think it's important to understand, that individual letters with the asbestos results have already been provided to each building owner/manager and occupants of the residences tested. This would not be the first time Individuals are seeing their results.
I hope this clarifies the issue. We would like to get this out for the public soon, so please let us know if you have add'l concerns...thanks.
>>> Vincent Coluccio 04/09/02 03:03PM >>> Mary
Thank you for your email. I will discuss this matter with Dr. Miller.
Vin Coluccio
Nancy Loder Jeffery Director Environmental and Occupational Disease Epidemiology (212) 788-4290
»> <[email protected]> 04/09/02 01:01PM >»
Hello Vincent: 1
NYC-WTC_000163696
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
NYC-WTC_000163690
Discussion on modifying notes regarding a residence where DEP was denied access for asbestos reinspection and the apartment was cleaned.
5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.996
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000163693
Internal correspondence discussing a bulk test result exceeding 1% in an apartment, denied access by property management, and resolution options.
5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.990
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000163701
Inquiry regarding the difference between air monitoring contracts performed at a specific school and Board of Education contracts.
5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.985
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000163688
DOH discussion of public asbestos sampling plan, building test results, and individual notifications to property owners.
5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.979
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗5 shared non-person entities · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.947
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160918
Technical discussion comparing TEM analysis results showing over 1% asbestos versus PLM analysis showing Non-Detect for the same building unit.
5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.984
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164497
DEP internal communication about failed reinspection attempts at an unoccupied apartment in Building 11 and proposed revisions to documentation notes.
5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.983
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000154825
Interdepartmental correspondence discussing failed DEP attempts to access and reinspect an unoccupied apartment, documenting denial of access and landlord-reported cleaning prior…
5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.982
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160912
Internal DEP memo discussing asbestos bulk test result exceeding 1% in an apartment, access denial by building occupants, and options for resolution.
5 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.952
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164500
DEP internal memo addressing inability to access an apartment for asbestos inspection due to denial of entry and discussing options for resolving a potentially hazardous asbestos…
5 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.949
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000152788
A corrupted or unreadable document file containing garbled text and binary data.
4 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.946
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164489
Discussion regarding asbestos sampling results in an apartment and potential release of a draft document.
5 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.946
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
NYC-WTC_000094473
Memo transmitting air sampling results for January 31, 2002, including asbestos data from 86 Trinity Place.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
Minutes from a March 20, 2002 meeting covering task force interactions and chemical risk characterization.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
Memo requesting cost estimates for mailing letters to participants in the WTC Dust Cleaning Program to process a change order.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
Official letter from the Department of Environmental Protection requesting environmental hazard assessments and cleanup summaries.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer