NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 43/E-mails 2003 M. Gilsenan
Document / 5 pages

EPA Report Review Comments, April 2003

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

DEP staff review EPA draft report on WTC exposure and sampling issues for legal comment submission.

NYC-WTC_000163103–000163107

Folder label: “E-mails 2003 M. Gilsenan

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000163106
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

RE: Article for Review: DEP Completes Downtown Cleanup Page 4 of 5

---- Original Message----- From: Hotz, Jonathan [ mailto:[email protected] <mailto;[email protected]> ] Sent: Monday, April 07,2003 4:24 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: Article for Review; DEP Completes Downtown Cleanup

Penny;

I realize this is somewhat short notice. While we would love to get this up tomorrow, it is not imperative that we do so. Just let me know what's feasible on your end.

Thanks again for all your help.

Jonathan

---- Original Message----- From: Hotz, Jonathan To: Radhakrishnan, Krish; Gilsenan, Michael; 'Theodorellys, Penny' Sent; 4/7/2003 12:53 PM Subject; Article for Review: DEP Completes Downtown Cleanup

Good afternoon.

We would like to post the attached story on www.lowermanhattan.info to be published tomorrow. We would appreciate if you could run through the necessary channels to review and approve.

The article is essentially a condensed and updated version of November's story. You can find that story by clicking through to: http://www.lowennanhattan.info/tools/news/print_story,asp?referrer=/news <http;//www.lowermanhattan.info/tools/news/print_story.asp?referrer=/news> < http://www. lowermanhattan. info/tools/news/print_story,asp?referrer=/news <http://www.lowennanhattan.info/tools/news/print_story.asp?referrer=/news >

/nyc_dep_to_complete_47584.asp. In the attachment, I have highlighted new numbers in blue.

You'll note that there seems to be some discrepancy between the last article and the current piece with regards to number of buildings inspected and number of buildings earmarked for cleaning. In November's story, we indicated that of 1072 buildings inspected, 326 were found to have some form of asbestos-containing material. According to the latest tally, there were 1073 buildings inspected, of which 323 were cleaned. In the interest of getting the facts straight, can you confirm/clarify this information and put it into appropriate context if necessary.

Of course, please feel free to make additional comments and suggestions as you see fit.

4/10/2003

NYC-WTC_000163106

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000163106Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

No available related records indexed in this group.

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →