NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 56/EXTERIOR
Document / 3 pages

Permit Application Scope of Work, NYC-WTC, undated

Machine-extracted title · confidence 90%

Application defining regulatory compliance requirements for exterior debris removal work at WTC vicinity.

NYC-WTC_000135569–000135571

Folder label: “EXTERIOR

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000135570
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

RE: Article for Review: DEP Completes Downtown Cleanup Page 1 of 2

Radhakrishnan, Krish From: Hotz, Jonathan [[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 3:59 PM To: Theodorellys, Penny' Cc: Gilsenan, Michael; Radhakrishnan, Krish Subject: RE: Article for Review: DEP Completes Downtown Cleanup

NYC DEP Completes Downtown Cleanup

On March 31, 2003, the New York City Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) completed work removing potentially hazardous dust and debris that accumulated on the roofs, windows and facades of downtown buildings following the World Trade Center collapse. DEP crews cleaned the surfaces of 221 building, or more than 3.6 million square feet of exterior building space, during the 10-month long project.

We finished work on March 26, 2003, the contract ended March 31, 2003.

The DEP began inspecting buildings in Lower Manhattan in January 2002 for exterior residue containing more than 1 percent of asbestos, the threshold set by the EPA, the U.S. Department of Labor, New York State and the DEP. Among a small sample of buildings close to the WTC site, 48 percent tested 'o 23 positive for asbestos contamination. This finding prompted the DEP to begin a comprehensive inspection of the more than one thousand buildings in the DE- 1' 22.1 area. 2 "J "There was great concern among people in Lower Manhattan," said Robert 7 Avaltroni, Deputy Commissioner of the DEP. "We needed to act quickly to relieve that anxiety so people who live and work in the area could move forward with their lives."

The DEP inspected 1,073 buildings in Lower Manhattan, of which 323 - approximately 30 percent - were found to have some form of asbestos-contaminated WTC debris and were earmarked for cleaning to help alleviate public concern regarding potential exposure to asbestos and other contaminants.

We visually inspected for debris. If debris was present, we earmarked it for cleaning. We did not perform additional sampling because of the original results. Therefore, it is not accurate to state that 30% was found to be asbestos-contaminated. We could state "were found to have been impacted by WTC debris".

The DEP notified the owners of the affected buildings, giving them the option to have the cleanup done by the DEP or through an independent contractor of their own choosing. The owners of 102 buildings elected to have their buildings cleaned independently. (The DEP has since re-inspected

5/13/2003

NYC-WTC 000135570

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000135570Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

DEP WTC activities chronology, April 2002 · Box DEP Box 11

NYC-WTC_000151519

Memorandum from DEP to Health Department summarizing chronology of WTC-related activities including cleanup coordination, air quality monitoring, and building reopening advisories.

6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.959

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →