NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 43/E-mails 2003 M. Gilsenan
Document / 3 pages

Laboratory explanation of PAH detection limit revision, March 2003

Machine-extracted title · confidence 85%

Laboratory response explaining method detection limit versus practical quantitation limit for PAH analysis and confirmation that samples did not require reanalysis.

NYC-WTC_000163085–000163087

Folder label: “E-mails 2003 M. Gilsenan

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000163086
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

sarr/ples'^sing the lower detection limit. This would result in the date and time analyzed to differ between the original and revised analytical data sheets (scenario 2). Thus, I need confirmation regarding which of the two scenarios above occurred.

Thanks,

Chuck Nace Environmental Toxicologist

USEPA - Region 2 290 Broadway - 18th Floor New York, NY 10007-1866

212.637.3459 212.637.4164 212.637.4360 - fax nace.charlesSepa.gov

"Theodorellys,

Penny" To: Charles Nace/R2/USEPA/US@EPA <ptheodorellys@de cc: "Radhakrishnan, Krish" <[email protected]>, "Gilsenan, Michael" p.nyc.gov> <mgilsenan@dep .nyc.gov>

Subject: FW: Revised PAH results 03/25/2003 03:36

PM

Revised PAH results.

---- Original Message---- From: Andrew Gasparro [mailto:[email protected] ] <mailto:[mailto:[email protected]]> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 4:28 PM To: 'Theodorellys, Penny' Subject: FW: Revised PAH results

<<R03030157 revised Report.pdf» «R03030158 revised Report.pdf» Penny, I hope this reporting method is correct. Please let me know if we need to make any additional changes on this. Thank you.

Andrew L. Gasparro Vice President JLC Environmental Consultants, Inc. 200 Park Ave. S. Suite 1001 New York, NY 10003 212-420-8119 2

NYC-WTC_000163086

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000163086Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →