NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
sarr/ples'^sing the lower detection limit. This would result in the date
and time analyzed to differ between the original and revised analytical
data sheets (scenario 2). Thus, I need confirmation regarding which of
the two scenarios above occurred.
Thanks,
Chuck Nace
Environmental Toxicologist
USEPA - Region 2
290 Broadway - 18th Floor
New York, NY 10007-1866
212.637.3459
212.637.4164
212.637.4360 - fax
nace.charlesSepa.gov
"Theodorellys,
Penny" To: Charles
Nace/R2/USEPA/US@EPA
<ptheodorellys@de cc: "Radhakrishnan,
Krish" <[email protected]>, "Gilsenan, Michael"
p.nyc.gov> <mgilsenan@dep .nyc.gov>
Subject: FW: Revised PAH
results
03/25/2003 03:36
PM
Revised PAH results.
---- Original Message----
From: Andrew Gasparro [mailto:[email protected] ]
<mailto:[mailto:[email protected]]>
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 4:28 PM
To: 'Theodorellys, Penny'
Subject: FW: Revised PAH results
<<R03030157 revised Report.pdf» «R03030158 revised Report.pdf»
Penny,
I hope this reporting method is correct. Please let me know if we need
to
make any additional changes on this.
Thank you.
Andrew L. Gasparro
Vice President
JLC Environmental Consultants, Inc.
200 Park Ave. S. Suite 1001
New York, NY 10003
212-420-8119
2
NYC-WTC_000163086
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.