~T do lly!, Penny_
From: Usbeck, Fred [[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:23 PM
To: [email protected]; Theodorellys, Penny
Cc: Radhakrishnan, Krish; Gilsenan, Michael;
[email protected]; Playez, Dave; Johnston, Mark
Subject: RE: FW: Revised PAH results
Chuck -
In response to your question about the change in the reporting limit for the PAH
wipe samples:
Our normal PQL (practical quantitation limit) is 5 ug for each PAH for this
method, however, our MDL (method detection limit) is 1 ug for` each PAH. For
this reason we did not need to rerun these samples - we went back to the raw
data to verify that there weren't any "hits" above the 1 ug MDL for these samples,
and reprinted the report with the revised reporting limit.
I will ask the guys in the lab to print a few chromatograms to demonstrate the
new 1 ug DL and send them to Andrew at JLC. I'm sure he won't mind sharing
these with you.
If you have any other questions please get back to me.
thanks! Fred
NYC-WTC 000101162
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
NYC-WTC_000101162Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally
Laboratory response explaining method detection limit versus practical quantitation limit for PAH analysis and confirmation that samples did not require reanalysis.
DEP review of revised PAH laboratory results for 114 Liberty identifying concerns about detection limit consistency between original and revised analytical sheets.
Laboratory response explaining method detection limit versus practical quantitation limit for PAH analysis and confirmation that samples did not require reanalysis.
DEP review of revised PAH laboratory results for 114 Liberty identifying concerns about detection limit consistency between original and revised analytical sheets.