NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 43/E-mails 2003 M. Gilsenan
Document / 2 pages

E-mails 2003 M. Gilsenan

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000162736–000162737
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000162736
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Gilsenan, Michael

From: i____________________ PH_____________________ I Sent: Saturday, January i 1, 2003 11:23 AM To: [email protected]; Jack Springston; Gilsenan, Michael; Daniel Kaner; Karen Greenspan; Mark Wainger; Steven Elghanian Co: Linda Rosenthal; Yvonne Morrow; Christopher Warnick; Denise Sweeney Subject: RE; Meeting at 114 Liberty; Thursday January 16th @ 10:00AM

Dave: I have an appt at that time, but I will try and break it and make it over to the building at 10AM. Thanks,

---- Original Message---- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sat 1/11/2003 11:00 AM To: "Jack Springston"; "Gilsenan, Michael"; "Daniel Kaner"; "Karen Greenspan"; "Mark Wainger"; j______ ph_______ i "Steven Elghanian" Cc: "Linda Rosenthal"; "Yvonne Morrow"; "Christopher Warnick"; "Denise Sweeney" Subject: Meeting at 114 Liberty: Thursday January 16th @ 10:00AM

Let's go for Thurday in the morning then. I believe Jack, the DEP, Chris Warnick, and I can make it. Hopefully, others can make it also. The purpose of the meeting is to work out final details for scope of work and how to execute the project. There are certain differences in specifications at this time. We will work to figure out how to resolve the differences or work around them through project planning and coordination.

We at 114 Liberty need to determine specifically what we need to do in advance of the DEP project. It is important for us to finalize this and get it out to bid, and to start the project as soon as possible. Then, while we are working on the building, the DEP can start their bid process and be ready to take over as soon as we are ready.

Thanks, Dave

Regards, Dave Stanke

"Jack Springston" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Wednesday am is no good for me, pm should be okay, Thursday am is fine. > >---- Original Message---- >From: Gilsenan, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:36 PM >To: 'Dave Stanke'; Jack Springston; Daniel Kaner; Karen Greenspan; Mark >Wainger; ; PH J Steven Elghanian >Cc: Linda Rosenthal; Yvonne Morrow; Christopher Warnick; Denise Sweeney >Subject: RE: Proposed meeting to determine scope of 114 Liberty Project: >Monday January 13th at 1:30 PM.

>We are looking at Wednesday, 1/15, a.m./early afternoon or Thursday, 1/16, >a.in.. Does anyone have trouble with these times?

>---- Original Message---- >From: Dave Stanke [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:43 PM >To: Gilsenan Michael; Jack Springston; Daniel Kaner; Karen Greenspan; >Mark Wainger PH \ Steven Elghanian >Cc: Linda Rosehth'aT;'''Yvohne''M6rrow; Christopher Warnick; Denise Sweeney 1

NYC-WTC_000162736

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000162736Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →