NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 43/E-mails 2002 M. Gilsenan
Document / 6 pages

E-mails 2002 M. Gilsenan

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000162665–000162670
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000162669
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

•Criteria [To be placed in next Public Assistance Program Guidance document and sent to applicants by either FEMA or NYC OMB/OEM] If an eligible applicant identifies a facility that requires testing for contamination after the emergency work completion deadline of September 10, 2002, the following steps must be taken in order to be considered for FEMA reimbursement: 1. The applicant must submit its test results and any analyses to the NYC Deptartment of Environmental Protection 2. The DEP will (1) Review the results and analyses, (2) Consult with NYC's Dept, of Health if necessary, (3) Submit in writing to FEMA, under signature of Robert Alvatroni, Deputy Commissioner, its concurrence that contamination is present at a hazardous level, along with the test results, and provide a recommendation for remediation. 3. FEMA will review the applicant's request and DEP's recommendations. If FEMA finds the request and remediation recommendations reasonable and necessary, FEMA will grant an emergency work time extension and prepare a PW for the cost of testing and remediation.

---- Original Message---- From: Levine, Michele [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 8:55 AM To: Hagerty, Steve Cc: Larson, Bud; Gray, Beth; Diaz, Mariel; Levy, David Subject: FW: Follow Up

Steve: It seems that there's some confusion with DEP about your proposed policy. Have you reached out to Bob Avaltroni since his e-mail (the one we interpreted differently; I thinking he was unaware of the policy proposal and you thinking he was unaware ,of the agency claims)? It seems like FEMA project staff are operating on the assumption that this policy is already in place (see Walter's BOE e-mail you forwarded to me), however, I we need to clarify the situation with DEP, and I still need to hear back from the Law department as well. Michele

---- Original Message---- From: Levy, David Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 4:14 PM To: Levine, Michele Subject: Follow Up

5

NYC-WTC_000162669

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000162669Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

No available related records indexed in this group.

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →