4 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.998
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗EPA cleanup project pricing issues summary, Oct 2002
Machine-extracted title · confidence 80%Summary of pricing issues from EPA cleanup project meeting with discussion of resolution process and contractor notification procedures.
NYC-WTC_000161500–000161502Folder label: “E-mails R. Avaltroni 2002”

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
CLEaNINS tACTOR PRICING ISSUES 1) Oversized units - One bedroom or studio apartments in loft type space where the square footage is exceedingly large. For example, we have run into one bedroom unit exceeding 5,000 square feet and a one bedroom unit with large areas of home office space. The contractors have requested price adjustments for these situations. (Note: DEP agreed to address this issue) 2) The contractors requested that the contract be modified to contain a "termination for convenience" clause in case scheduling issues persist and customer interest in the program declines. 3) Common Space Carpeting - In situations where a building owner requests that carpeting be removed, and the work does not fall under the NYC asbestos abatement program, the contractors requested a price adjustment for the cost of carpet removal and disposal as ACM. 4) Large Terraces - The contractors have requested a price adjustment to address the cleaning of large terraces that are accessible from an individuals residence. (Note: DEP agreed to address this issue) 5) One contractor (Terroon, Quad D) suggested that they should have the ability to bill up-front for out of pocket expenses and make cost adjustments since the ratio of supervisors to staff is out of line due to slow rate of cleaning at this point. 6) An HVAC qualified contractor (Termon) requested that they be able to clean HVAC units utilizing the partial unit cleaning scheme provided for in the SOW. They also requested that encapsulation of the internal insulation components of the units be priced since cleaning of insulation is not effective and the bid sheets do not provide for encapsulation techniques. 7) Termon requested an adjustment for additional compensation for removal of materials associated with carpet removal, like underlying padding, tacking and glue strips. 8) Termon had a question about cleaning HYAC systems to NADCA standards but not performing microbial cleaning. According to Termon, NADCA standards include microbial cleaning and they are willing to do it, for a cost adjustment. 9) Termon did not include the cost for cleaning supply and return plenums providing HVAC to apartments in their unit price for cleaning partial HVAC systems. Termon interpreted this item as providing cleaning for HVAC systems without extensive duct systems. If this situation occurs Termon will provide pricing on a case by case basis. MONITORING CONTRACTOR PRICING ISSUES 1) Offsite scheduling work is not reimbursable under the terms of the contract. It is considered part of overhead. The Contractors claim that they are spending a much greater amount of time them expected reaching out to tenants to schedule cleaning.
2) Evaluation of kitchen and bathroom vents was not specifically priced in the bid sheets. Based upon limited field observations we observed that evaluating five of these vent systems is roughly equivalent to the level of effort to evaluate one HVAC system. Accordingly, we recommend that a five to one ratio
NYC-WTC_000161501
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Related records
Browse subjects →Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
Same-box records
No available related records indexed in this group.
Filed elsewhere
NYC-WTC_000130635
Message addressing contractor pricing problems and formal resolution procedures for WTC remediation project.
4 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.997
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗4 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.996
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000130631
Message addressing contractor pricing problems and formal resolution procedures for WTC remediation project.
4 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.991
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000163582
Memo summarizing pricing issues raised at a meeting regarding contractor costs, with request for guidance on resolution process and formal EPA procedures.
4 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.985
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗3 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.983
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000151510
Letter summarizing meetings with contractors regarding pricing concerns and resolutions for the World Trade Center cleanup program.
4 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.977
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000151229
Fax cover sheet from the New York City Response and Recovery Office to EPA Region 1 in November 2002.
4 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.971
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗4 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.971
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000151150
Summary of issues raised by contractors including chain of custody, mold, lead paint, and payment disputes.
2 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.936
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000130626
Memo summarizing contractor issues regarding the indoor air dust cleaning program in Lower Manhattan.
2 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.935
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000151237
Cover sheet from the EPA Region 1 transmitting documentation related to the World Trade Center response in November 2002.
2 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.929
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗More like this page
Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
Similarity score 0.998 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000130631
Message addressing contractor pricing problems and formal resolution procedures for WTC remediation project.
Similarity score 0.998 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.998 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000130635
Message addressing contractor pricing problems and formal resolution procedures for WTC remediation project.
Similarity score 0.997 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.993 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.992 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Others also read
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
NYC-WTC_000096047
Report describing dust survey results at 75 Park Place on October 20 and 25, 2001.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000105771
Airtek Environmental Corp. submits a notice of air quality testing results and chain of custody forms for 176 Broadway in October 2001.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000138525
Administrative communication regarding building access documentation and requirements for 114 Liberty cleanup operations.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000141711
Document outlining eligibility criteria and fund distribution for businesses affected by the World Trade Center disaster.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer