NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 42/E-mails R. Avaltroni 2002
Document / 11 pages

WTC Q and A document transmission, March 25 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 85%

Transmission of WTC-related Q and A document to interagency task force with EPA Regional contact information.

NYC-WTC_000160683–000160693

Folder label: “E-mails R. Avaltroni 2002

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000160686
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Q. How do we know that what was found on the pile isn’t in my apartment?

A. The dust in your apartment is similar to the dust found around the site of the World Trade Center. As EPA has stated, this dust has been found to contain asbestos, and it should be either professionally cleaned up or handled very carefully, depending on the volume of the dust in your apartment. When the buildings collapsed, they projected an enormous amount of dust and debris into the lower Manhattan area. It is likely that some dust entered most apartments within the proximity of the WTC site.

Q. How much wUl it cost to clean my apartment?

A. There is still uncertainty about the cost per apartment for sampling, cleaning and post­ cleaning testing. (THIS ANSWER SEEMS INCOMPLETE - CAN FEMA HELP PAY FOR SOME CLEANUPS?HEPA VACS? Can we say that “FEMA and other relief agencies have been providing assistance in acquiring equipment if you wish to clean your own apartment and in paying some re-location costs or cleanup costs (??) if you chose professional cleaning”? )

Q. Why are you cleaning only one building when Sen. Clinton/Rep. Nadler asked you to clean 10,000 apartments?

A. EPA’s and NYC’s task forces are exploring if additional cleaning recommendations need to be provided to occupied buildings and if additional testing or cleaning may be needed in some apartments. The information we gather from cleaning an unoccupied building, along with information from a NYC DOH and ATSDR indoor air study and more than 100,।323 samples taken by private contractors inside buildings in lower Manhattan, will be used to determine what followup actions may be needed in some apartments.

Category; ci t risks — what we know so far.,

Q. Did EPA give bad guidance on indoor air?

A. EPA gave good guidance on air quality based sampling data. We acknowledged some risk, especially to workers on the pile who were directly exposed to smoke and were working in the dust. For area residents and workers we said that there ddid not appear to be a long term risk based on the levels of pollutants we were finding. This has been bom out by not only our sampling - more than 15,'323 samples so far - but also exptensive sampling from the NYCDEP, OSHA, and others.

Q. How can I know what risk I or my family faces?

A. We’re evaluating what information we have. Given the tens of thousands of samples that have been taken by EPA and others, EPA does not anticipate any increased risk from exposure to WTC material for residents and office workers from the ambient air. We do know that the dust contains some asbestos, and we have removed the vast majority of dust from the outside -

NYC-WTC_000160686

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000160686Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →