NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 26/WORLD TRADE CENTER - JOHN LADUCA FILES
Document / 32 pages

EPA memorandum on WTC environmental data concealment, July 2004

Machine-extracted title · confidence 85%

EPA internal memorandum addressing allegations that NYC and EPA concealed environmental data following 9/11, with evidence not previously evaluated in an August 2003 EPA Inspector…

NYC-WTC_000153780–000153811

Folder label: “WORLD TRADE CENTER - JOHN LADUCA FILES

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000153786
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

See Section N of my 7/4/03 report'^ for documentation of how these levels triggered an evacuation and professional cleaning of the EPA building the week after 9/11, while at the same time EPA was telling the press that there were no problems at the EPA building, EPA's response at its own building establishes that it found these levels to be significant indicators of contamination by WTC dust.

Original NYC data is what NYC and EPA believed to represent hazard after 9/11 - irrelevant of whether alterations and deletions were clerical or "more careful examination of data"

The alterations and deletions were not typographic errors, because they were one-sided, always showing lower or no asbestos levels, never the other way around.

NYC might offer the excuse that the altered/deleted data eventually posted on its web site represented more careful scrutiny of the laboratory results. Even EPA has conveniently "re­ worked" the asbestos data to now show lower asbestos levels.

This argument, however, cannot hold sway. After 9/11, before any alterations of the data, NYC believed people were being exposed to the higher levels contained in the original version of the data, not the altered version released in early 2002. NYC did not warn anyone. Instead, they concealed the information.

EPA concealment of NYC data EPA "no asbestos hazard" claim in press releases of 9/13/Oland 9/14/01

The following statements by EPA on 9/13/01 and 9/14/01 claim either no asbestos found or below levels of concern, the exact opposite of what the NYC data demonstrated:

Monitoring and sampling conducted on Tuesday and Wednesday have been very reassuring about potential exposure of rescue crews and the public to environmental contaminants. EPA's primary concern is to ensure that rescue workers and the public are not exposed to elevated levels of asbestos, acidic gases or other contaminants from the debris. Sampling of ambient air quality found either no asbestos or very low levels of asbestos. ... Additional sampling of both ambient air quality and dust particles was conducted Wednesday night in lower Manhattan and Brooklyn, and results were uniformly acceptable. "EPA is greatly relieved to have learned that there appears to be no significant levels of asbestos dust in the air in New York City," said Administrator Whitman. [EPA press release, 9/13/01, emphasis added]

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Labor's Occupational Health and Safety Administration today announced that the majority of air and dust samples monitored at the crash site and in Lower Manhattan do not indicate levels of concern for asbestos. ... New OSHA data also indicates that indoor air quality in downtown buildings will meet standards. ... "Our tests show that it is safe for New Yorkers to go back to work in New York's financial district," said John L. Henshaw, Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA. ... [EPA press release, 9/14/01, emphasis added]

7

NYC-WTC_000153786

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000153786Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

No available related records indexed in this group.

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

NYC-WTC_000091539 · Box DEP Box 68

Raw laboratory sequence file listing pesticide compounds and calibration standards processed in late 2001.

Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer

Compare copies and versions →