NYC-WTC_000152910

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

1 percent by weight of the million or so tons of dust produced by the disaster. In normal air, he said, fine particles make up 20 percent to 30 percent of the total mass of particulates. But Peter Montague, the director of the Environmental Research Foundation, a public-interest group based in New Brunswick, N.J., said that the quantity of fine particles remained troubling. "One percent of a million tons is 10,000 tons," he said. "So you've got 10,000 tons of fine particles. That's a lot." Mr. Montague also noted that the study reported on the relative concentration of fine particles in the dust that settled, not the dust in the air. Smaller particles would be more likely to remain airborne, he said. Mr. Montague said the same team of scientists had published an earlier finding that there were "significant ambient levels" of compounds similar to polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCB's, in the first day after the attack. PCB's have been linked to cancer. "Everyone who breathed this stuff should continue to have their health checked, because no one really knows what was in it," he said. Dr. Lioy said that larger particles, particularly pulverized concrete and glass, were likely most responsible for the "World Trade Center cough" that many people have reported. Smaller particles, he said, were more likely to cause cancer, emphysema and other long-range problems. The compounds analyzed in this study, known as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, are the products of incomplete combustion. They include fluorene and pyrene. The relative prevalence of larger particles, Dr. Lioy said, was probably due to the wide variety of conditions in the various fires. "This was just mass chaos, and the fire was a chaotic fire," he said. "You would not expect anything consistent in terms of the nature of the burn." Most of the dust samples were collected within a couple of blocks of the World Trade Center. Two were collected from atop cars about half a mile east, on Market Street near the East River. Across the East River, in Brooklyn, many people have complained that the pollution that drifted into Brooklyn from the disaster has not been sufficiently studied. Dr. Lioy said he regretted that no samples had been taken from Brooklyn immediately after 9/11, but he added that there was no reason to believe the composition of dust in Brooklyn would be much different from the dust nearer the site.

<http://graphics7.nytimes.com/images/article/article_hr.gif > Doing research? Search the archive for more than 500,000 articles: Today's NewsPast WeekPast 30 DaysPast 90 DaysPast YearSince 1996

<http://graphics7.nytimes.com/images/article/article_hr.gif >

<http://graphics7.nytimes.com/images/article/functions/top.gif > <http://ea.nytimes.com/cgi-bin/email?REFURI=http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/2 4/nyregion/24DUST.html> <http://ea.nytimes.com/cgi-bin/email?REFURI=http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/2 4/nyregion/24DL)ST.html&position=bottom> E-Mail This Article <http://www.nytimes.eom/2002/12/24/nyregion/24DUST.html?pagewanted=print&pos 5

NYC-WTC_000152914