OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
X. Sample Description Needs;
In order to interpret results, the following information should accompany each area sampled:
1. Reason for selection of site for sampling (e.g., apartment had windows open or broken during the WTC event; visible dust present in ambient air adjacent to apartment building)
2. Description of samiple location Physical address Apartment/floor number Side of building (N, S, E, W) Main entryway
3. NYDEP check list/building inspection report
4. For indoor sample locations, provide the following: Has area been cleaned since WTC event? Date(s) of cleaning If so, description of cleaning wet mopping dusting sweeping (Broom, vacuum, HEPA vacuum) carpets washed Is visible dust present? If so, describe
5. For entryway sampling locations (e.g., lobbies) Is there evidence of dust track-in from outdoors Same questions as #3
6. For outdoor sampling, provide the following: Location of samples relative to main entryways of residential buildings Side of building (N, S, E, W) Location of samples relative to roadways ' Location of samples relative to dust-generating activities (e.g,. construction) Is visible dust present (air, surfaces) If so, describe
7. Description of HVAC system Single or multi-unit system (if multi-unit, how many?) Location of HVAC air handling unit (e.g., in each unit, in each window, on roof-top) Description of conditions around HVAC air handling unit (e.g., heavy dust, no apparent dust) Location(s) of intake(s) Location(s) of discharge(s) Date of last filter cleaning or filter replacement Filter type (e.g., electrostatic)
Page 9 of
NYC-WTC_000152810
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
NYC-WTC_000152814
Draft document outlining concepts and priorities for sampling buildings near the WTC to identify worst-case contamination scenarios.
15 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 1.000
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗16 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.999
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000153247
Draft protocol for assessing airborne and settled dust exposures in residential areas following the World Trade Center collapse.
14 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.992
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000152825
Draft protocol establishing procedures for evaluating airborne and settled dust in residential and commercial areas near the World Trade Center.
15 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.991
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000153241
Draft protocol for assessing airborne and settled dust exposures in residential areas following the World Trade Center collapse.
15 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.987
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000153258
Draft protocol for assessing airborne and settled dust exposures in residential areas following the World Trade Center collapse.
15 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.980
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000153220
Draft protocol outlining objectives and locations for assessing airborne and settled dust exposures in residential areas.
14 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.980
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗15 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.992
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164960
Draft compilation of asbestos air samples collected from residential areas November-December 2001 by NYC DOH and ATSDR.
16 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.980
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139656
Forwarded spreadsheet compiling residential asbestos sampling results collected in November-December 2001, including Building 11 reoccupancy assessment.
15 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.980
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139712
Series of emails forwarding a draft memo between DEP staff members for review and finalization.
16 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.979
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164732
Draft spreadsheet of asbestos sampling results from residential locations collected November-December 2001, circulated for review.
16 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.979
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
NYC-WTC_000141585
Map showing the condition of buildings at the World Trade Center site as of September 21, 2001.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000148742
Notice instructing staff to preserve original World Trade Center documents for potential legal actions against the City.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
New York Daily News article excerpt discussing an activist's role in the revival of Lower Manhattan.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000143452
Unreadable text fragment containing isolated letters and symbols from an unknown source document.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000151742
Letter responding to correspondence regarding the EPA World Trade Center Cleanup Program, noting that extensions through December 28, 2002, were sufficient for registration.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer