NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 11/No folder label
Document / 2 pages

DEP public affairs fax cover sheet with inquiry questions, Feb

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Fax cover sheet from DEP Public Affairs dated February 1, 2002, containing questions about indoor air and dust asbestos testing.

NYC-WTC_000151994–000151995
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000151995
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

1) Indoor air testing for asbestos was the responsibility of the building owners or their representatives. In isolated cases, DEP did some indoor air samples for asbestos very early in the disaster.

2) Consistent with the above policy.

3) Not at this time. Need to find out from Legal if we can release building owners’ consulting reports.

4) Indoor air testing for asbestos was the responsibility of the building owners, however, for other air contaminants (VOCs, heavy metals, acid gasses, PCBs, etc.) all health and environmental agencies agreed that if air contaminants from the World Trade Center were not found in the outside (ambient) air, then the same contaminants would not be found indoors.

5) The DEP is qualified to handle asbestos problems identified indoors. Indoor air quality has no standards, only guidelines as published by the USEPA.

6) No, we never said not to involve EPA with asbestos, however, DEP took the lead in all asbestos-related issues. DOH and ATSDR undertook an independent study of a segment of a building in the downtown area for asbestos and other particulate matter.

7) DEP used the EPA established method - using PLM for bulk and PCM/TEM for air. DEP stated in its September 14,2001 advisory, and September 26,2001 revision, that micro vacuum and/or wipe sampling are not recognized methods for sampling asbestos and should not be used. Bulk sample analysis (PLM) must be performed by laboratories with NYS ELAP accreditation.

8) Using a method not recommended by regulators.

9) The NYC DOH issued health advisories and clean-up recommendations based on asbestos results at the time. The results at the time indicated that the general public’s health affects were very low. Testing since has indicated the same to be true (or we can refer to DOH if DOH agrees).

10)

a) Once again it was the building owners responsibility to make a professional assessment of their building. In cases where the public feels a building owner has been remiss, the public had been instructed to call to DEP’s Help Line.

b) DEP is not in a position to determine a health risk that is the purview of DOH.

NYC-WTC_000151995

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000151995Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Memo draft for DEP Commissioner, Oct 2001 · Box DEP Box 11

NYC-WTC_000150163

Internal memo draft addressed to the Commissioner regarding environmental compliance actions and correspondence drafts dated October 15, 2001.

6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.937

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →