NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 11/No folder label
Document / 4 pages

New York Times article on physician assessment of asbestos risk,

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Article featuring a physician stating that asbestos exposure risks are very small for most residents despite higher danger for workers.

NYC-WTC_000151979–000151982
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000151979
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document \^RQUALITY

Expert Says Asbestos Slightly Raised Risks for By KIRK JOHNSON. assuring news. should not worry them. wrXi... ...X In a presentation in Manhattan “It’s important to keep this risk in K ? ^ousands of peo- ^Jvin said that for the vast majority tude of risk that I think people ought ■2-ple in Lower Manhattan as a result of people exposed to asbestos — from to be terrorized by or fearful of on a the collapse of the World Trade Cen- ijgjjjg caught in the dust cloud of the day-to-day basis.” n« /^r, a prominent New York physician collapsing towers, for example, or Asbestos, a fibrous mineral that yesterday. from cleaning up their apartments was used for decades in the Insula- Arti 7^® higher, he said, for offices — the risk of ever getting tion of buddings, including parts of ^^ Jhbse who worked under the most gfck ^as “very, very small.” the twin towers, was not the only ^^idzardous conditions, and much of jje also said, after examining test material that people were exposed to the danger could have been reduced results and cleanup records in some after the Sept. 11 attack. The billow- eliminated entirely if proper pre- schools in Lower Manhattan, includ- tag dust cloud contained pulverized '“^^ehtive action had been taken. ing stuyvesant High School and Pub- concrete, fiberglass and other ma- ' But the physician, Dr. Stephen M. nc School 150, that students and par- terials. Acrid smoke from the fires ^^ Levin, the medical director at the ents in those schools should have that burned for more than three '^^“iVrount Sinai School of Medicine’s Irv- little concern about long-term health months at the site irritated the lungs . ipg J. Selikoff Center for Occupation- effects. and sinuses of thousands. ‘'al Health and Environmental Medi- in general, he said, people who But it is asbestos, perhaps because "^2^cine, which has treated more pa- regularly walked by the disaster site of the broader public awareness of ^“"^)ents for trade center-related respi- on their way to or from work in the its risks and the fear its name .yT^tory complaints than perhaps any days and weeks afterward were ex- evokes, that has dominated the de- other hospital, also had^^^ome re- posed f^lower asbestos levels, which bate ^ut the medical and environ-

Disease Among Residents ofLower Manhattan mental consequences of the attack, towers smashed much of the asbes- this way,” he said. Scientists have weighed in on the tos in the buildings into tiny fibers. Other public health experts said risks presented by short asbestos which have been shown in animal that Dr. Levin’s presentation re­ fibers and long ones. Some residents tests to be generally less dangerous taforced their assessment that the and workers have said that they be- than longer fibers. (Short fibers, long-term health consequences of the lieved there were cover-up conspira- however, have been linked in some attacks were not likely to be severe cies, perpetrated by the city, the studies to a relatively rare cancer for the general population. federal government or building own- called mesothelioma that affects “My assessment hasn’t changed,” ers, to minimize cleanup costs and about one in a million people in the said Patrick I* Kinney, an associate liabilities. general population. Dr. Levin said.) professor of public health at the Dr. Levin’s presentation conclud- But the risks from asbestos expo- Mailman School of Public Health at ed that for most people, the added sure were also compounded for Columbia University. “The main risks were slight, not because asbes- many people, including rescue and health concern was workers around tos is less deadly than believed, but cleanup workers, who did not wear the pile,” he said. because most people did not get the respirators sufficient to protect their But Professor Kinney added that level of exposure that, statistically, lungs at ground zero and nearby, there had been health effects that has produced disease. One-time ex- Many day laborers, including large were not life-threatening, including posure that results in cancer many numbers of immigrants who spoke new cases of asthma and sinusitis ta „ years later is extremely rare, he little or no English, were hired to people who were exposed to the dust. said, and the scarring of the lungs clean up dust-laden buildings. Dr. “Beyond that. I’m not aware of that characterizes diseases like as- Levin said, with little or no protec- any data that has suggested that bestosls generally requires years of tion or instruction. people off-site have suffered any im- exposure. “It’s a public health outrage that portant health consequences,” he The catastr^hic collapse of the they were peypiltted to be exposed said.

(Vnu) \ 1 bMJ

NYC-WTC_000151979

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000151979Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

EPA expanded cleanup plan memo, August 2002 · Box DEP Box 11

NYC-WTC_000151949

Memo regarding EPA's expanded plan to clean and test Lower Manhattan apartments for asbestos, dioxins, and toxic metals following the World Trade Center disaster.

8 shared non-person entities · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.948

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →