NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
1
AvaltronS, Robert
From: Bader, Doreen
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:29 PM
To: Avaltroni, Robert
Cc: McCarthy, Anne; Hoffer, Mark
Subject: RE: Email request on 110 Liberty Street
I also sent an email to the student and echoed your referral to EPA. Apparently, EPA told her that this report would not be
available to the public until February 2003.
Doreen
From: Avaltroni, Robert
To: Hoffer, Mark; Bader,Doreen
Cc: McCarthy, Anne
Subject: RE: Email request on 110 Liberty Street
Date: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:20AM
We responded to this on 10/29 and referred to EPA's website and Helpline. As per Krish Radhakrishnan, we do not have
any results.
—Original Message—
From: Hoffer, Mark
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 11:35 AM
To: Bader, Doreen
Cc: Avaltroni, Robert; McCarthy, Anne
Subject: RE: Email request on 110 Liberty Street
I have no problem with sending the student the statistics on the clean-up (what was found and how much). Bob Avaltroni
sh. be advised before this goes out.
I would not send any subjective evaluation or critique of the clean-up work.
—Original Message—
From: Bader,Doreen
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Hoffer, Mark
Subject: Re: Email request on 110 Liberty Street
Importance: High
The student responded to my email. It reads as follows:
"I attend Drexel University for civil engineering. This is my fourth year and am currently doing a research project. I am
simply looking for the results of the study the EPA did on 110 Liberty on the effectiveness of various clean-up efforts. I am
looking for the analyses that were done. I hope you can help."
I did ask her if she contacted EPA directly, since she mentions the federal agency. Please advise.
Thank you,
Doreen
From: Hoffer, Mark
To: Bader,Doreen
Subject: Re: Email request on 110 Liberty Street
Date: Thursday, October 31,2002 2:29PM
Priority: High
Hi
What I meant was that in the world of FOIL, inter or intra-agency documents are generally exempt from public disclosure,
with certain excptions. One such exception is "statistical or factual tabulations of data" (I think I remembered it right), which
has always been construed to mean an agency should make available statistics or other strictly factual info, even if
contained in an internal document. Thus, Mike Principe provides Riverkeeper with lots of final, verified water quality
monitoring results (note the stress on "final, verified" - we are not obligated to disclose rough numbers in the nature of a
draft, that are subject to verification).
1
NYC-WTC_000151715
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.