NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 10/ATSDR/DHAC_ASTM
Document / 59 pages

ATSDR/DHAC_ASTM

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000149683–000149741
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000149690
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

Z Z o --- ----- o io DRAFT (September 20,2001,11 a.m.) EPA, DOL, and DHHS Environmental Assessment Workgroup Asbestos Action Levels for World Trade Center Response co

I Action Level (f/cc) & Analysis Method General Public/Recommendations' Basis Comments ■D o c o CT o NYC Background^ PCM/PCMe’ • No restriction on access to any area. Lowest attainable cancer risk • Remediation goal is to achieve background o' co levels. ■D CJ> o CD • Considered AHERA guidance for schools 3. 03 O which requires that indoor air levels for schools, remediated for asbestos, should be o o similar to local outdoor air levels for schools. o — c 3 NYC Background to 0.01 PCM/PCMe • No restriction on access to streets and AHERA standards (40 CFR 763) No significant cancer risk for short-term (less CD O public/commercial building. than 6 months) occupancy for residential and • Interim access, no longer than 6 months, approved for school buildings. residences and schools: ■ Resample to confirm levels and identify source ■ Take action to reduce levels to background

0.01 - O.I PCMMPCMe • Limit access to a few hours for the general public. Lowest limit set at 1/10 • Long-term exposures (longer than 8 • Continue to collect both ambient and indoor air PEL/REL/TLV hrs/day) may increase cancer risk in the samples. general public. • Unlike workers the general population includes: children and sensitive persons, does not receive exposure monitoring, and does not participate in annual health screening

> 0.1 PCM/PCMe • Restrict general public access. Unacceptable cancer risk General public should not be exposed to • Continue to collect both ambient and indoor air levels suspected of adverse health effects. samples.

Action levels (C^cc) for workers involved in emergency Disaster Response and Recovery Workers Basis Comments response and recovery activities (follow applicable OSHA standards)

0.1 PCM only • Respiratory protection required for workers, based on PEL Value, 0.1 fZcc based on an eight hour time an 8 hour time weighted average (TWA) of exposure of weighted average, is the Occupational Safety 0.1 PCM. Longer shift work, i.e., lower levels of and Health Administration’s (OSHA) exposure (i.e., the proportional maximum exposure for a Permissible Exposure Limit for asbestos, as 12 hour shift is 0.07 fZcc PCM). specified in the OSHA Construction Industry Regulation for Asbestos, 29 CFR 1926.1101.

1.0 PCM only • The maximum allowable level for workers average STEL Value, 1.0 ftcc measured over a 30-minute over 30 minute period (OSHA short term exposure period, is the Occupational Safety and Health level). Administration’s (OSHA) Short-Term Exposure Limit for asbestos, as specified in the OSHA Construction Industry Regulation for Asbestos, 29 CFR 1926.1101. = 1. General public includes adults and children not directly involved in emergency response and recovery activities. 2. Background levels for NYC being determined. 3. PCM equivalents (PCMe) should be determined using consistent methods to provide comparable concentrations.

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000149690Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →