NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 10/ATSDR/DHAC_ASTM
Document / 59 pages

ATSDR/DHAC_ASTM

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000149683–000149741
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000149719
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Uncertainty also exists in determining at what level and duration of exposure people might experience irritation or other symptoms from exposure to fibers and crystalline minerals.

• The likelihood of experiencing irritation from individual contaminants or contaminant mixtures is uncertain. A short exposure to a small amount of an irritant may be tolerated, but exposures that continue for a longer period of time or are to a larger amount of an irritant, may overwhelm the body’s ability to remove the irritant and increase the likelihood of irritation. Individual differences also play a significant role in whether or not irritation occurs. Using a risk estimate from an occupational situation may underestimate risks for more sensitive or susceptible individuals in the general population. Some of the information needed to estimate the risk of irritant symptoms, is not available from this study. When assumptions are made in the absence information (e.g., the duration and intensity of the total exposure) additional uncertainty is introduced.

• Persons with pre-existing respiratory (e.g., asthma, emphysema) or cardiopulmonary problems are more likely than healthy individuals to experience adverse health symptoms at lower levels of airborne particles and contaminants. Airborne dust and crystalline mineral levels based on studies of healthy individuals are levels that underestimate the risk for a susceptible individual.

• Individuals who were in the lower Manhattan area when the WTC collapse occurred may have received a bolus inhalation dose of dust, fibers, crystalline minerals, and other materials. Health effects of a bolus dose are not known. Additional exposures would add to the potential for health effects. Therefore, the short and long-term health effects, if any, of such an exposure cannot be determined from the measurements made in this study.

RESULTS

This section of the report will provide an overview of what was determined by this investigation. The overall analytical findings will be presented according to what environmental media was sampled (air or settled surface dust, Figures 7-17).

A. Survey

The primary duty of the sampling team was to coordinate with the building management to identify sampling locations that would yield results representative of the area sampled. These duties included identifying unoccupied residences that could have aggressive air sampling conducted. In addition the sampling teams photographed equipment setup and operation, sampling locations, distribution of surface dust, and general conditions around the building.

18

NYC-WTC_000149719

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000149719Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →