NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Limitations
While the goal of the sampling was to evaluate the air and dust samples for a range of
contaminants, there is no one sample collection method or analysis that can provide all of
the determinations that were desired. The analysis strategy was to identify what
components were present in order to provide the public with information quickly if any of
the analyses revealed a significant concern. In order to strive for both of those goals, some
modifications to conventional protocols were made which limited some analyses from
determining ihe precise level of the materials in the sample (e.g., XRD conducted on air
and dust samples). Whenever an analysis is expanded beyond its specific intent, there is the
potential loss of sensitivity and an increase in the variability in the data. Those particular
analytical results are reported as estimated values and marked with a “J.”
Results for the airborne particulate matter were rejected due to issues found during the
quality assurance analysis. However, ihe XRD analysis for airborne minerals that used the
same filter samples as the particulate matter analysis are considered valid because the
analysis method does not depend on the filter sample weighing process used to determine
the particulate matter concentration. The XRD mineral air concentrations are based on
individual mineral weight standard curves—not the weight of the dust sample collected on
the filters. These standard curves are not impacted by pre- and post-sampling filter weight
variability.
Air Sampling Results
Total fiber counts of air samples taken in lower Manhattan were similar to the comparison
areas above 59th Street sampled during this investigation. The six lower Manhattan areas
that had elevated total fiber counts were re-examined by TEM and SEM to determine the
types of fibers. The TEM and SEM results indicated that neither asbestos nor synthetic
vitreous fibers (e.g., fiberglass) contributed to the elevated total fiber counts.
Air sampling results for minerals detected quartz (a form of crystalline silica) and other
building-related materials in lower Manhattan. The other forms of crystalline silica were
not detected in any air samples except for a one-time detection of cristobalite. The
estimated concentrations of these minerals in air were low. In some locations, mineral
components of concrete (quartz, calcite, and portlandite) and mineral components of
building wallboard (gypsum, mica, and halite) were detected in air samples at higher
estimated levels in lower Manhattan residential areas than in samples taken at comparison
residential areas above 59th Street. The levels of minerals seen in airborne dust do not
pose potential health hazards even for a continuous year of exposure at the highest levels
detected.
Settled Surface Dust Results
Results of the settled surface dust analysis indicate the composition of settled surface dust
in lower Manhattan is different than the dust analyzed from the comparison areas above
59th Street. Although the materials foimd are consistent with materials expected from the
4
NYC-WTC_000149705
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.