NYC-WTC_000149432
DEP asbestos project notification form and inspection report dated December 12, 2002.
25 shared non-person entities · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.978
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Document / 146 pages
Chain of Custody Form Instructions for WTC Building Sampling
Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%Instructions and sections for collecting sample location data from a specific building interior.
NYC-WTC_000149537–000149682Folder label: “ATSDR/DHAC_ASTM”
Page image
OCR text
OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
I r & ?<: '5& ft- :• S x / x -wt-xS'-'X-x •.• - ; Y ■ ' 3 X -■■■' S' « B >■ I ' ••• ♦'■^ /VT
- li.’i ? ■ a a- H < I 4j 5? 1 x: px::gss<5:;yx:;.
I Bi I - is •' f^S 1 I z ' s§
I I I asJSg;
a I i 'iW'X I I i / ; : III
NYC-WTC_000149650
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
NYC-WTC_000149650Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally
Related records
Browse subjects →Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
Same-box records
NYC-WTC_000149798
Generic form or header page from the Department of Environmental Protection regarding general World Trade Center notices and requests.
24 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.975
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Filed elsewhere
41 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.991
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164732
Draft spreadsheet of asbestos sampling results from residential locations collected November-December 2001, circulated for review.
26 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.989
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139712
Series of emails forwarding a draft memo between DEP staff members for review and finalization.
26 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.989
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139656
Forwarded spreadsheet compiling residential asbestos sampling results collected in November-December 2001, including Building 11 reoccupancy assessment.
25 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.988
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164960
Draft compilation of asbestos air samples collected from residential areas November-December 2001 by NYC DOH and ATSDR.
26 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.988
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164784
Transmission of revised asbestos sampling results for residential samples collected November-December 2001.
24 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.986
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000153220
Draft protocol outlining objectives and locations for assessing airborne and settled dust exposures in residential areas.
16 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗15 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000153258
Draft protocol for assessing airborne and settled dust exposures in residential areas following the World Trade Center collapse.
17 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000159829
Coordination memo for WTC recovery inter-agency meeting on building and parks assessment and scope.
22 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗More like this page
Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
NYC-WTC_000168066
Document titled Wired for the Future likely detailing telecommunications infrastructure proposals for 7 World Trade Center.
Similarity score 0.976 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000144027
Single unreadable slide from a Department of Environmental Protection presentation regarding post-9/11 environmental activities.
Similarity score 0.975 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000144026
Single unreadable slide from a Department of Environmental Protection presentation regarding post-9/11 environmental activities.
Similarity score 0.974 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000144001
Multi-page visual document or presentation from the pictures/presentations folder of World Trade Center environmental records.
Similarity score 0.974 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000144172
Fragmented text and symbols from a DEP record in Box 07.
Similarity score 0.974 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000144091
A presentation slide from the DEP regarding World Trade Center site activities.
Similarity score 0.973 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Others also read
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
NYC-WTC_000146129
Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000164671
Draft document titled World Trade Center Emergency Safety and Health Plan dated September 30, 2001.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000152439
Letter from Con Edison to DEP regarding follow-up on water pumped from a gas main during the World Trade Center recovery.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000123875
Letter from environmental consultants summarizing ambient air sampling and cleanup activities at 225 Rector Place.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000153382
Document arguing that respirator safety issues fall under OSHA jurisdiction and should be removed from the EPA review.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer