NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 09/No folder label
Document / 2 pages

Memo regarding REBNY meeting and DEP project details, April 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 94%

Update on scheduling a meeting with REBNY representatives to discuss project details and required documentation.

NYC-WTC_000147432–000147433
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000147432
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Av^roni7RofiiBrr’ Zj From: Giisenan, Michael Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 1:29 PM To: Chapin, Diana 001 Cc: Avaltroni, Robert; Sturcken, Charles 001; Radhakrishnan, Krish Subject: REBNY Mtg.

M. Davenport from REBNY called me today to confirm Thurs. mtg. with REBNY and representatives from Battery Park. I informed her that I wasn't sure if DEP's letter and release form would be ready for the mtg and that maybe we could reschedule. She said that the letter and release form were secondary to DEP addressing the group, especially since she invited people outside the group. Additionally, the next mtg.would not take place for another 28 days. It seems that REBNY is just interested in hearing the details of the project. I told her that it was not a problem and we would be there. I will contact her tomorrow with the attendees.

NYC-WTC_000147432

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000147432Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →