NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
The results for two of the three micro vacuum samples indicate that asbestos was present
at levels similar to those observed before cleaning. The third micro vacuum sample was
reported as being below the detection limit.
The results for the five wipe samples indicate that two of the five samples were below the
detection limit, although one of these samples had chrysotile detected. The remaining
three samples had chrysotile detected at concentrations above the detection limit. Unlike
the micro vacuum samples, the results of the wipe samples collected after the first cleaning
were lower than the pre-cleaning concentrations. This indicates that the cleaning
techniques used were able to reduce the concentrations of asbestos in settled dust.
Post Cleaning - Five asbestos air samples were collected after the second clearang.
The samples were analyzed for PCM, TEM AHERA, and PCMe. The PCM, TEM
AHERA, and PCMe results could not be obtained due to the filters being overloaded with
particulate material. Due to inconclusive PCMe results, a third cleaning was conducted.
Post Cleaning - Four asbestos air samples were collected after the third cleaning. The
samples were analyzed for PCM, TEM AHERA, and PCMe. The PCM results indicate
that one sample was below the detection limit and the other three were at the detection
limit. All PCM results were below the secondary numeric criterion of 0.01 ftcc. The
TEM AHERA results had chrysotile detected above the detection limit; however, all four
results were below the secondary numeric criterion of0.022 S/cc. The PCMe results
indicate that two of the samples which were collected under a modified-aggressive
sampling methodology, were below or at the detection limit. The remaining two samples,
collected under an aggressive sampling methodology, were slightly above the primary
clearance criterion of 0.0009 S/cc with results of 0.0015 S/cc and 0.0016 S/cc. The
results obtained from the samples collected with the modified-aggressive sampling were
used as evidence of meeting the primary clearance criterion.
Dioxin
Before Cleaning Samples - Three pre-cleaning wipe samples were collected and analyzed
for dioxin. The results indicate that dioxin was present; however, the TEQ concentration
for each sample was below the primary clearance criterion of 4 ng/m^.
Post Cleaning Samples -Four post-cleaning wipe samples were collected and analyzed
for dioxin. The results indicate that the TEQ concentration for each sample was below the
primary clearance criterion of 4 ng/m^. Since dioxin was below the detection limit for all
of the samples collected, there were no additional dioxin samples collected.
Gypsum
Before Cleaning Samples - Pre-cleaning air samples were not collected.
Post f‘ Cleaning Samples - Two air samples were collected after the first cleaning.
Gypsum was not detected in any sample.
Lead
Before Cleaning Samples - Three micro vacuum samples and three wipe samples were
74
NYC-WTC_000145772
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.