NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 08/NO INFO
Document / 174 pages

Chain of custody form for DEP environmental samples, 2001

Machine-extracted title · confidence 90%

Form documenting the tracking and handling of environmental samples collected by the Department of Environmental Protection.

NYC-WTC_000145695–000145868

Folder label: “NO INFO

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000145814
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

As shown in Table 15.0, the comparison of these results suggest that no conclusive difference could be observed.

Overall, the samples collected using the aggressive technique had a slightly higher percentage of samples below the detection limit (80 percent vs. 69 percent) than the samples collected with the modified-aggressive technique, while the samples collected using the modified-aggressive technique had a lower average concentration (0.00045 S/cc) than the samples collected using the aggressive technique (0.00071 S/cc).

5.9 Filter Overloading

As mentioned above, there were many instances where the filters from the asbestos air samples were overloaded with particulate material and could not be analyzed, which resulted in invalid asbestos air results and required additional cleaning events. During the study, the use of an air filtration device was added to the cleaning method for the third cleaning in an attempt to reduce the airborne particulate matter as both previous air sampling events resulted in overloaded filters. This occurred twice. In both cases, there was no overloading of the filters and valid asbestos air results were received. This prompted an evaluation to determine if there was a noticeable reduction in overloading filters with particulate matter when an AFD was used during the cleaning event. The data for all of the units in the building were used to see if there was a difference in the percentage of units with at least one overloaded filter when an AFD was used.

Table 16.0 presents a comparison of the percentage of units, including residential, common spaces, and commercial spaces, with asbestos air samples that could not be analyzed due to the filter being overloaded with particulate matter, and indicates whether or not an AFD was used. The data suggest that using an AFD during cleaning may offer a slight advantage for reducing the potential for overloading a filter with particulate matter.

116

NYC-WTC_000145814

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000145814Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

NYC-WTC_000136990

Archival folder label for September 11 news clippings from the Office of the Mayor, identified as Folder 0123.

Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer

NYC-WTC_000153313 · Box DEP Box 26

Updated memorandum defining the Red Zone boundaries and listing authorized agencies for entry into the restricted area.

Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer

NYC-WTC_000149744 · Box DEP Box 10

Policy document outlining NYPD access requirements for building owners and contractors at the site in October 2001.

Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer

Compare copies and versions →