NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 06/DEP 59.17 Junction Blvd, 11th FL
Document / 11 pages

NYC DOH hotline Q&A on building cleaning and HVAC maintenance,

Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%

Q&A document advising landlords on HVAC filter changes and asbestos assessment requirements following the disaster.

NYC-WTC_000142699–000142709

Folder label: “DEP 59.17 Junction Blvd, 11th FL

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000142706
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

exposures. These tests cannot determine where, when, or how long the individual was exposed or whether they will develop health effects related to these exposures.

Medical tests exist for heavy metals, including elemental mercury and lead. The preferred test for lead exposure is a blood test while the most accurate test for environmental exposure to elemental mercury is a urine test. The DOH has investigated reports of elevated mercury among four workers at the site and found that initial tests of blood mercury were slightly elevated. Blood mercury can be elevated if a person has consumed fish within sixty days of the test. Urine mercury is a more specific test for exposures to metallic (elemental) mercury, the type of mercury of concern for occupational exposures. Follow-up urine tests of these workers did not reveal elevated mercury levels. Personal air sampling at the site among individual workers found that mercury was not elevated in the air. Given these low levels found in both clinical and environmental sampling at the site, at this time testing residents for mercury levels is not warranted.

Medical tests exist to measure levels of PCBs and dioxins in blood, body fat, and breast milk, but these are not routinely conducted for community exposures because most people have low levels of these substances in their bodies already.

Ill OUTDOOR RELATED ISSUES A. Outdoor Air Testing

• Who is doing research on the synergistic effects of the various toxic substances together in the outdoor air?

I understand DOH has answer. • Since the only standards for assessing the impact of asbestos are for occupational exposure over 20 years, does this mean that residents of Lower Manhattan could be more at risk for a shorter period of time since many people are in the area for 24 hour periods (NOT an 8 hour day like factory workers?)

• How do you respond to scientists who say that the standards being used to assess heaith impacts of asbestos are too low?

B. Parks

• Are local parks and playgrounds cleaned regularly? Can there be a sign posted as to when the park was last tested and cleaned?

?-// NYC-VVTC_000142706

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000142706Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →