NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 05/EPA Cate Jenkins
Document / 42 pages

EPA memorandum regarding asbestos reservoir, June 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 50%

Forwarded EPA memorandum dated June 9, 2002, concerning the Asbestos Reservoir and carpet testing methods.

NYC-WTC_000140083–000140124

Folder label: “EPA Cate Jenkins

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000140102
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

EPA REGION 2 BENCHMARK OF 1% ASBESTOS IN WTC DUST

Unfortunately, the different EPA regions are autonomous in many ways, and are free to set health standards to meet the needs of individual situations. There is no oversight or control by the experts in EPA’s Headquarters or other centers of technical excellence, such as EPA’s Office of Research and Development satellite campuses in Cincinnati and Research Triangle Park. Thus, the unilateral setting of an incorrect health standard in direct conflict with EPA regulations, statutes, and precedents by perhaps one lone toxicologist at an isolated regional office is not uncommon.

The preceding section described Region I's actions in the case of the Brookfield School System, setting an asbestos dust benchmark of45,000 s/cm^. This section will describe what Region 2 did in setting a completely different, but also false, unsupported health standard for asbestos dust after the collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC). The Region 2 asbestos dust benchmark is 1%. The NYC Department of Environmental Protection (NYC DEP) also decided to set their benchmark at 1% asbestos. It is obvious that the Region 1 and Region 2 benchmarks are quite different from each other. This fact alone demonstrates that there is no consistency between health standards set by the different EPA regions.

The following statements are made at the EPA web site relating to the WTC disaster.'*” Region 2 clearly states that 1% is the “level of concern for health.”

If a substance contains 1% or more asbestos, it is considered to be an "asbestos-containing material." EPA is using the 1% definition in evaluating dust samples from in and around ground zero and other areas potentially impacted by the World Trade Center collapse. The majority of areas in which EPA has found levels of asbestos in dust above 1% are in the vicinity of the World Trade Center work zone. Daily summaries of this data and how it compares to the level of concern for health are also available, [emphasis added]

In Dust. If a substance contains 1% or more asbestos, it is considered to be an "asbestos-containing material." There are federal regulations in place to ensure the proper handling and disposal of asbestos-containing material. If a substance contains less than 1% asbestos, these regulations do not apply.

EPA is using the 1% definition in evaluating dust samples from in and around ground zero. The vast majority of the samples taken to date have levels of asbestos below 1%. In fact, in an urban environment like New York City, we can expect the presence of a low level of asbestos under normal circumstances (these low everyday levels are called "background levels").

Counsel for Region 2 supported the choice of this benchmark by claiming that only asbestos over 1% was “significant”

- 18-

NYC-WTC_000140102

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000140102Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →