NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 05/EPA Cate Jenkins
Document / 40 pages

EPA memorandum on carpet asbestos testing, June 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 50%

Technical memorandum from EPA discussing ultrasonication testing for asbestos in carpets and HEPA vacuuming effectiveness.

NYC-WTC_000140040–000140079

Folder label: “EPA Cate Jenkins

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000140075
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Jenkins, C. (March 11,2002) Status of air and dust asbestos testing after WTC collapse; 1. Misrepresented “safe levels* and standards for asbestos; 2. Failure to test at low levels related to safety; 3. Region 2 relied on more sensitive TEM tests for settled dusts in own building, required by EPA policy, did not provide same sensitive testing for rest of NYC, and refused Region 8 offer of free sensitive testing for rest of NYC. Cate Jenkins, Hazardous Waste Identification Division, OSW, EPA, memorandum addressed to affected parties and responsible officials. Posted at www.N YenviroLAW .org

36. Millette, J. R., and Hays, S. M. (1994) Chapter 6. Data: Levels of asbestos in dust, pages 49- 50. In: Settled Dust Sampling and Analysis, Lewis Publishers, CRC Press. 37. Barr, H. (June 4,2002) Feeling fallout of asbestos Brookfield could spend $3M on cleanup, tests. THE NEWS-TIMES, www.newstime.com.

McKinney, M. P. (June 5,2002) Experts weigh in on asbestos risk Should parents be worried? Depends who you ask. THE NEWS-TIMES, www.newstime.com.

38. Rhode, V. (May 19 and 22,2002) Personal communication. Results of dust and AHERA air testing in music room at the Huckleberry Hill Elementary School in Brookfield, CT. Vernon Rhode, Industrial Hygienist, S & B Environmental, 40 Valley Field Road S., Sandy Hook, CT 06482, (203) 426-3704, [email protected].

39. See series of news articles in News Times, Danbury, CT., posted at www.newstimes.com. In the upper right-hand scroll box, choose “Brookfield” to get to the relevant series of news articles. 40. EPA website on September 11 Response. See page posted at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/wtc/activities.htm and every individual data page linked to the map of bulk dust sampling at http://www.epa.gov/enviro/nyc/bulkdust/ 41. Mugdan, Walter E., Esq., Regional Counsel for EPA Region 2 (January 25, 2002) Environmental law issues raised by terrorist events in 2001. Speech before the NY Bar Association. Posted at www.NYenviroLAW.org

42. Miele, J. A., Commissioner, Department of Environmental Protection, City of New York (October 25,2001) letter to Residents of Lower Manhattan. Posted on the internet at www.nyeljp.org.

43. Mugdan, Walter E., Esq., Regional Counsel for EPA Region 2 (January 25,2002), op. cit.

Counsel for Region 2 described the selective use of the definition of “asbestos containing material”in a speech:

One of the first decisions that EPA had to make when sampling for asbestos in the dust from the WTC collapse was what reference value to use when reporting the data - in other words, at what concentration of asbestos in the bulk dust samples would the Agency characterize the dust as containing asbestos in quantities of significance? EPA

-36-

NYC-WTC_000140075

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000140075Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →