NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 05/EPA Cate Jenkins
Document / 40 pages

EPA memorandum on carpet asbestos testing, June 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 50%

Technical memorandum from EPA discussing ultrasonication testing for asbestos in carpets and HEPA vacuuming effectiveness.

NYC-WTC_000140040–000140079

Folder label: “EPA Cate Jenkins

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000140056
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Table 4. RE-CALCULATION OF REGION 1 DUST BENCHMARKS USING MORE VALID VALUES

FORMULA USED BY REGION 1:

Benchmark for X K-Factor (K-Factor = Air Level, structures per asbestos in Dust expressed as an milliliter (s/mL) (s/cm2) exponential)

45,000 X 0.000001 ( 10-®) 0.045

This is the level derived from the This is the K-factor chosen by Region 1 for their This is the alleged background outdoor formula by Region 1 calculations, from the 2 highest ones from a total of six K- air level put into the formula by Region 1. factors. A higher K-factor results in a calculation of a This value is the one highest higher, less protective dust level. The two K-factors with measurement found in an early 1983 10(-6) values were for a person cleaning out a storage study. For most of the measurements, room and for a person vacuum cleaning. asbestos was not even detectable.

1,000 X 0.00001 (10-®) 0.01 Dust level if detection limit of the early This is the K-factor more applicable to a school. This is the detection limit of the study 1983 study is used, and K-factors representing gym activities and a person sweeping floors cited. Most ofthe actual measure air more applicable to a school are used, with a broom levels were below this detection limit

100 X 0.000001 (W-*) 0.0001 Dust level if air concentration is urban This is STILL the inappropriate K-factor chosen by Region Outside ambient air level, urban areas. level cited by the CDCs ATSDR. but 1 for their calculations found credible by the CDC's ATSDR still using the Inappropriate K-factor.

10 X 0.000001 ( 10-®) 0.00001

Dust level if air concentration is rural This is STILL the K-factor chosen by Region 1 for their Outside ambient air level, rural areas. level cited by the CDCs ATSDR, but calculations found credible by the CDC's ATSDR still using the inappropriate K-factor.

10 X 0.00001 (10-®) 0.0001 Dust level if K-factors more relevant This is the K-factor more applicable to a school. Outside ambient air level, urban air, to school used, and ATSDR value for representing gym activities and a person sweeping floors found by the CDC's ATSDR urban outdoor air used. with a broom

1 X 0.00001 (10-®) 0.00001

Dust level if K-factors more relevant This Is the K-factor more applicable to a school. Outside ambient air level, rural areas, to school used, and ATSDR value for representing gym activities and a person sweeping floors found by the CDC's ATSDR rural outdoor air used. with a broom

1 X 0.0001 (10-*) 0.0001

Dust level if average of the six K- Average of six different K-factors in study, allowing Outside ambient air level, urban air, factors used, and ATSDR value for for a safety margin of error found by the CDC's ATSDR urban outdoor air used.

0.1 X 0.0001 (10-*) 0.00001

Dust level if average of the six K- Average of six different K-factors in study, allowing Outside ambient air level, urban areas, fectors used, and ATSDR value for for a safety margin of error found by the CDC's ATSDR rural outdoor air used.

-17-

NYC-WTC_000140056

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000140056Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →