NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 51/105 DUANE STREET Block: 151 Lot: 1 BIN: 1001650 10-16 THOMAS ST1 TRIMBLE ST., TRIBECA TOWER
Document / 165 pages

DOH/DEP asbestos fact sheet draft, 105 Duane Street

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Draft fact sheet from DOH and DEP addressing tenant concerns regarding asbestos fibers at 105 Duane Street.

NYC-WTC_000125845–000126009

Folder label: “105 DUANE STREET Block: 151 Lot: 1 BIN: 1001650 10-16 THOMAS ST1 TRIMBLE ST., TRIBECA TOWER

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000125872
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

DRAFT j2§ ]2uau—e Street Fact Sheet

The New York City Departments of Health (DOH) and Environmental Protection (DEP) have been notified by the New York Environmental Law & Justice Project that tenants residing at 105 Duane Street are concerned that asbestos fibers, resulting from the collapse of the Twin Towers, are present within the building and its ventilation systems and pose a health concern. DOH has developed this fact sheet in order to help address these specific concerns.

What sampling has been performed for asbestos at 105 Duane Street?

• Sampling of the air in 209 locations (residential units and common areas) was performed by an environmental consultant, ATC Associates, on behalf of Related Management Company. • Sampling of three surfaces (two residential units and one common area) within the building and one dust sample from outside of the building was performed by the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) on behalf of DOH. • Sampling of two surfaces (a 10th floor apartment surface and common area air diffuser) was performed by Ed Olmst Cliff, on behalf of the tenants. • Sampling of the air in five locations 'thin the building ventilation s at t. f tte serviees the 10th floor common area and in ve ocations in a common area of 10th X A~- the building on the as witnessed by DEP. floor was performed by ATC Associates on behalf of and ^e-

What are the sampling results?

• All of the 209 air samples collected by ATC Associates, on behalf of Related Management Company, were within the most stringent standard used for clearance in an indoor environment. • No asbestos was detected in the surface and dust samples collected by USPHS. Results of a more detailed analysis of these samples are pending. • Both surface samples collected by Ed Olmstead using p vacuum sampling method showed the presence of asbestos fibers. ©w A ~}► All of the 10 air samples collected by ATC Associates, on behalf of ice, were l./ within the most stringent standard used for clearance in an indoor environment.

Do these results mean I have been exposed to dangerous levels of asbestos?

No. The mere presence of asbestos does not necessarily pose a health concern. For asbestos to cause health problems it must be inhaled All of the air samples collected at the building, including those from within the ventilation system, indicate that asbestos is not airborne in quantities that would pose a health concern.

Weren't the levels found on the supply air diffuser very high?

Z0/ d 9.29 9L9 ?T? T S3~1 's (1dnS dddl HOC DAN E3:ZT TOOE—LT-9SC

NYC-WTC 000125872

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000125872Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

No available related records indexed in this group.

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →