NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/DEP Box 45/60 PINE STREET 1001008, 41/15
Document / 2 pages

Building operation permit for sidewalk work at 60 Pine Street,

Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%

Department of Transportation permit authorizing concrete sidewalk work at 60 Pine Street from July to August 2002.

NYC-WTC_000114929–000114930

Folder label: “60 PINE STREET 1001008, 41/15”

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000114929
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

T New York City Department of Transportation

BOROUGH : MAN ATT N PERMIT # 02-2002193- iii INSPECT DIST: 1 RECORDED # : NONE PREVIOUS # : NONE BUILDING OPERATION PERMIT PERMIT VALID FROM 07/13/2002 TO 08/13/2002

FEES (NON-REFUNDABLE): IN PERMIT TYPE 0215 A PAVEMENT TYPE SIDEWALK TYPE CONCRETE ISSUE DATE 07/12/2002 I TOTAL FEE $****50.00 FEE WAIVED PERMISSION HEREBY GRANTED TO : NAME : TRIO ASBESTOS REMOVAL CORP . LICENSE # : CONTACT NAME : CHRIS HOW PERNITTEE # :12591 PHONE :( 718) 961 - 4100 CONTRACT # : ROF-REM ADDRESS : 14-20 129TH STREET COLLEGE POINT NY 11356 GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO OCCUPY THE SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF HOUSEt : 60 ON STREET PINE STREET FAO STREET : PEARL STREET TO STREET : VILLIAN STREET

FOR THE PURPOSE OF: TEMPORARY SIDEWALK CLOSING CLOSING THE SIDEWALK

*** SEE PAGE 2 FOR STIPULATIONS *** PERMIT ORIGINALLY PRINTED ON 07/12/2002 AT 13:09 BY SANDRA RELIFORD PAGE 1 OF 2

Ill PERMITTEES SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, >. RULES AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE NEW YORK CITY '~,~r ' ev ;; ~COMMISSIONER II DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT. FAILURE TO COMPLY , ~» _• ,,.._ ,, lii MAY RESULT IN REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT BY THE COM- MISSIONER. PER

NYC-WTC 000114929

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000114929Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →