Document / 11 pages
Invoice for facade remediation, 110 Reade Street, July 2002 Machine-extracted title · confidence 100% Invoice from Fiber Control Inc. dated July 18, 2002 for facade remediation services at 110 Reade Street.
NYC-WTC_000114683–000114693 Folder label: “110 READE STREET Block: 146 Lot: 10 BIN: 1001597 AKA's:”
Save to case Cite this page ↗
More like this page Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
Asbestos fiber analysis results for 60 Pine Street, July 2002 · page 3 · Box DEP Box 45 NYC-WTC_000114904
Laboratory report detailing microscopic analysis of samples for asbestos types and concentrations at the specified site.
Similarity score 0.989 (not a probability)
Asbestos fiber analysis results for 116 Nassau Street, June 2002 · page 3 · Box DEP Box 34 NYC-WTC_000098909
Laboratory report detailing transmission electron microscopy asbestos analyses performed by ATC Associates in June 2002.
Similarity score 0.989 (not a probability)
Asbestos fiber analysis report, 110 Liberty Street, July 2002 · page 3 · Box DEP Box 34 NYC-WTC_000100579
Technical report detailing transmission electron microscopy results for asbestos fiber analysis of samples from 110 Liberty Street.
Similarity score 0.988 (not a probability)
Asbestos fiber analysis report, 30 Wall Street, June 2002 · page 6 · Box DEP Box 40 NYC-WTC_000112345
Laboratory report from ATC Associates detailing asbestos fiber analysis results for samples from 30 Wall Street.
Similarity score 0.988 (not a probability)
Asbestos roof cleanup invoice for multiple sites, June 2002 · page 6 · Box Asbestos - BOX 14 NYC-WTC_000122088
Invoice from Fiber Control, Inc. for asbestos roof cleanup services at 92 Chambers Street and nearby locations in June 2002.
Similarity score 0.988 (not a probability)
Asbestos fiber analysis report by TEM, 114 Liberty Street, Jun · page 3 · Box DEP Box 34 NYC-WTC_000100758
Laboratory report detailing transmission electron microscopy results for asbestos fiber concentrations in samples from the site.
Similarity score 0.988 (not a probability)